<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Should you try Skype 4.0 Beta ?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/19/should-you-try-skype-40-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/19/should-you-try-skype-40-beta/</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:50:55 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: ExaFlop</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/19/should-you-try-skype-40-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-528672</link> <dc:creator>ExaFlop</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 01:04:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5041#comment-528672</guid> <description>For me 4.0 is better than 3.8 - completely new idea for skype. Must try for 2-3 weeks and then speak about.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me 4.0 is better than 3.8 &#8211; completely new idea for skype. Must try for 2-3 weeks and then speak about.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Denis</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/19/should-you-try-skype-40-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-377549</link> <dc:creator>Denis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5041#comment-377549</guid> <description>Skypecast  d&#039;nt work</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skypecast  d&#8217;nt work</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sasha Kovaliov</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/19/should-you-try-skype-40-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-377258</link> <dc:creator>Sasha Kovaliov</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:19:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5041#comment-377258</guid> <description>What is it? New iTunes? Why is it whole-screen design?
I want my little cozy bar back!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is it? New iTunes? Why is it whole-screen design?</p><p>I want my little cozy bar back!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: a</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/19/should-you-try-skype-40-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-377091</link> <dc:creator>a</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 07:06:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5041#comment-377091</guid> <description>well, a way to try skype 4.0 exists: make it portable!
http://portableapps.com/node/246
by this way many versions can co-exist.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, a way to try skype 4.0 exists: make it portable!</p><p>http://portableapps.com/node/246</p><p>by this way many versions can co-exist.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Roman ShaRP</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/19/should-you-try-skype-40-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-376780</link> <dc:creator>Roman ShaRP</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:58:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5041#comment-376780</guid> <description>I&#039;m not interested in video calls and interface change in that way.
I had not planned to install it anyway - I don&#039;t like to try first betas, but from now I will avoid it as long as possible...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not interested in video calls and interface change in that way.</p><p>I had not planned to install it anyway &#8211; I don&#8217;t like to try first betas, but from now I will avoid it as long as possible&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/19/should-you-try-skype-40-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-376455</link> <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:18:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5041#comment-376455</guid> <description>Horrible interface.  It looks like it was designed to run solely on Microsoft Bob.
This type of UI completely alienates all existing users of Skype.
It looks like it was designed for a full-screen kiosk that doesn&#039;t need to run any other applications.  Overly HUGE fonts, lots of wasted space.  Meant for big dummies who are half blind, not professionals.
Big disappointment.  Thank God this is only a beta version.  They have A LOT more work to do and need to re-think the direction they&#039;re considering.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Horrible interface.  It looks like it was designed to run solely on Microsoft Bob.</p><p>This type of UI completely alienates all existing users of Skype.</p><p>It looks like it was designed for a full-screen kiosk that doesn&#8217;t need to run any other applications.  Overly HUGE fonts, lots of wasted space.  Meant for big dummies who are half blind, not professionals.</p><p>Big disappointment.  Thank God this is only a beta version.  They have A LOT more work to do and need to re-think the direction they&#8217;re considering.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cyberbite</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/19/should-you-try-skype-40-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-376360</link> <dc:creator>Cyberbite</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:10:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5041#comment-376360</guid> <description>I would rather wait for the stable version!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would rather wait for the stable version!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
