13 Users Commented In This Post

Subscribe To This Post Comment Rss Or TrackBack URL
Alfred says:

never bothered to run those Vista tweaks.
Vista aint slow if you have a good computer and you set the right power options

Dan says:

Actually, whether real or not, I’ve solved anything from slow bootups to BSOD errors when disabling services I don’t need… especially those that allow unnecessary process’ to run.

joshua says:

really?

I’m not sure how it could be possible seeing as the majority of the services take up all of a couple kb of ram each.

Jefis says:

Disabling built in services you will gain performance, system will start up faster, and sure will gain performance boost.

Michael Shi says:

There were two things I turned off on my vista.

1. Vista sidebar. It slows down my system huge time
2. Windows Defender. It’s useless given I had my nod32.

That is all and My vista is very fast on a okay P4 solo-core PC.

Rarst says:

I guess we have whole generation raised on “magic tweaks” already. :(

Chopping of parts of OS doesn’t make system faster.

No amount of system services can challenge performance hit from some third party crap.

Use good apps, defrag and don’t touch system stuff. This is ultimate tweak. :)

PC less ultimate tweak is - do everything you can to stay on XP as long as you can and some time after it :)

Dave says:

@ Rarst…

“Chopping of parts of OS doesn’t make system faster.”

No, it doesn’t increase your CPU speed, but it gives you PC less to load and manage.

Have you ever used nLite and installed XP without the bloat? My XP running off a Virtual PC is MUCH faster than XP installed on a better computer.

Ceridan says:

Actually, a couple of services that run can have a fairly huge impact on system performance.

I don’t ’search’ for files on my hard drive that much, but the bloody “SearchIndexer service” absolutly eats hard drive performance just to provide quicker searches, so I generally turn it off as I have my files very well organized.

Windows Defender also doesn’t do me any good.

Side bar uses tonnes of memory, totally depends on the amount of gadgets you have loaded but the default ones actually use quite a bit.

To be honest though, if you want a system performance boost, turning off the ‘pretty themes’ will provide a bigger performance boost than most of the tweaks you see out there.

joshua says:

@Michael Shi… yes of course, those are options and will definitely have an effect on performance, I was referring to the so called useless background services which consume next to nothing of system resources but people insist make a difference.

Rarst says:

>Have you ever used nLite and installed XP without the bloat? My XP running off a Virtual PC is MUCH faster than XP installed on a better computer.

Probably you got my “chopping” in too general way, I was refering to current topic - disabling services and such aka useless tweaks.

nLite is advanced stuf most users won’t even figure out how to do from start to finish. It’s not really “tweaks” area. :)

Paul DeLeeuw says:

Vista is slower than XP for three reasons:
1. It uses a great deal of hard disk time, especially when booting up (due to hidden tasks)
2. It gives Microsoft programs and utilities (processes) an inordinate amount of processor cycles
3.It emphasizes security over performance, so moves files very slowly.
What can you do?
1. Go to task Scheduler. Under Task Scheduler Library is Microsoft. Open it and you’ll see a list of categories. Click on each and you will find all sorts of tasks that start up and run in secret. Most can be disabled (with a right click) or fiddled with.
2.Download and install Process Lasso. This program lets you limit the amount of processor time any program gets. It will also automatically throttle any processor hog.
3. Download Teracopy. This little gem automatically takes over file copy and does it many times faster than Vista.

Josh says:

That’s what this article was about… doing that will have little to no effect on performance

I found pretty much no difference between Teracopy copy times and Vista SP1 copy times.

Paul DeLeeuw says:

There must be some difference in our systems. I moved several files ranging from 14MB to 230MB from one hard drive to another. Both connected with SATA. The Vista mover spent several seconds calculating how long it would take, then took 47 seconds to move the files. Teracopy moved them immediately and took just under 30 seconds. I do not have SP1. That is another story.

Leave Your Comments Below
Hello, please leave your thought below

Please Note: Each comment will be manually approved by an admin. There is no guarantee that a comment will be posted. Please do not submit the comment multiple times.