<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo marks dangerous search results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/05/07/yahoo-marks-dangerous-search-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/05/07/yahoo-marks-dangerous-search-results/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Buckley</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/05/07/yahoo-marks-dangerous-search-results/#comment-401831</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Buckley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=4029#comment-401831</guid>
		<description>Yahoo has posted a false “Unsolicited Emails” warning associated with our website, www.rumford.com, when searching for “Rumford fireplaces”.  The warning is generated by Yahoo’s partner, McAfee SiteAdvisor. False because SiteAdvisor says they made that determination by “entering our e-mail address on this site”.  Problem is, we have no forms or any other way to automatically enter an email message.  I do all the site maintenance manually in html and sweep all the pages onto the Internet myself.

Thinking that SiteAdvisor had somehow made a simple mistake, I tried to contact them by phone and email - to no avail.  After a month of trying, I have not gotten to anyone who will listen.  Rather, I get transferred from one anonymous customer relations person to another.  Same so far with McAfee and Yahoo.

So I have complained to the Washington Attorney General and the California and Texas Better Business Bureau and have hired a lawyer - just to try to get someone in charge to talk with me.

I have also spent some time surfing the blogs to see what others think about McAfee and Yahoo. I learned that McAfee falsely targets many websites with their faulty but arrogantly defended technology - and then blames their victims.  There is plenty of discussion about the websites McAfee has falsely red tagged on several blogs, such as http://ycorpblog.com/2008/05/05/do-you-know-where-you-mouse-has-been/  and http://www.crn.com/security/208401061 and http://groups.google.com/group/Google_Webmaster_Help

I also discovered at http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2006-3.htm that McAfee paid a $50 million penalty to settle a lawsuit filed against them by the SEC for fraud.

Anyone want to join us in a class action suit please contact me.

Jim Buckley
360 385 9974
buckley@rumford.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo has posted a false “Unsolicited Emails” warning associated with our website, <a href="http://www.rumford.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.rumford.com</a>, when searching for “Rumford fireplaces”.  The warning is generated by Yahoo’s partner, McAfee SiteAdvisor. False because SiteAdvisor says they made that determination by “entering our e-mail address on this site”.  Problem is, we have no forms or any other way to automatically enter an email message.  I do all the site maintenance manually in html and sweep all the pages onto the Internet myself.</p>
<p>Thinking that SiteAdvisor had somehow made a simple mistake, I tried to contact them by phone and email - to no avail.  After a month of trying, I have not gotten to anyone who will listen.  Rather, I get transferred from one anonymous customer relations person to another.  Same so far with McAfee and Yahoo.</p>
<p>So I have complained to the Washington Attorney General and the California and Texas Better Business Bureau and have hired a lawyer - just to try to get someone in charge to talk with me.</p>
<p>I have also spent some time surfing the blogs to see what others think about McAfee and Yahoo. I learned that McAfee falsely targets many websites with their faulty but arrogantly defended technology - and then blames their victims.  There is plenty of discussion about the websites McAfee has falsely red tagged on several blogs, such as <a href="http://ycorpblog.com/2008/05/05/do-you-know-where-you-mouse-has-been/" rel="nofollow">http://ycorpblog.com/2008/05/05/do-you-know-where-you-mouse-has-been/</a>  and <a href="http://www.crn.com/security/208401061" rel="nofollow">http://www.crn.com/security/208401061</a> and <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/Google_Webmaster_Help" rel="nofollow">http://groups.google.com/group/Google_Webmaster_Help</a></p>
<p>I also discovered at <a href="http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2006-3.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2006-3.htm</a> that McAfee paid a $50 million penalty to settle a lawsuit filed against them by the SEC for fraud.</p>
<p>Anyone want to join us in a class action suit please contact me.</p>
<p>Jim Buckley<br />
360 385 9974<br />
<a href="mailto:buckley@rumford.com">buckley@rumford.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/05/07/yahoo-marks-dangerous-search-results/#comment-368482</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 05:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=4029#comment-368482</guid>
		<description>I think quite the opposite. 

Point 1

My website is marked as having dangerous downloads and this is causing me business damage however, we have no dangerous downloads on our website.

Point 2

The databse used is by McAfee under site advisor. This is also shown on Yahoo as being the source. As of today (june 13th 2008) our website is still being so represented in error AND McAfee on their own website publich the database as being of December 2007.

Point 3
No company has the right of incorrect slander and in attempts to take the responsibility and protect internet users, that company must also take the responsibility to ensure data is correct otherwise they cross the fine line between public opinion/free speach and slander.

My contact with both Yahoo and McAfee has been without fruit, as one can expect with such large companies. Contact with customer services about the problem has left me with nothing.

I have been forced to collect screenshots of the slander, collect documented thrid party proof that our website does not hold dangerous downloads and forced to collect leters and other proof from our customers regarding measurement of business damage.

Now I am trying a final time to contact the companies involved and with no anger, request that they update their systems. But to be honest, my patience is wearing thin.

So I say WELL DONE GOOGLE and dont try to be more policemen on this planet, unless of course your are preparaed to accept ALL the responsibilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think quite the opposite. </p>
<p>Point 1</p>
<p>My website is marked as having dangerous downloads and this is causing me business damage however, we have no dangerous downloads on our website.</p>
<p>Point 2</p>
<p>The databse used is by McAfee under site advisor. This is also shown on Yahoo as being the source. As of today (june 13th 2008) our website is still being so represented in error AND McAfee on their own website publich the database as being of December 2007.</p>
<p>Point 3<br />
No company has the right of incorrect slander and in attempts to take the responsibility and protect internet users, that company must also take the responsibility to ensure data is correct otherwise they cross the fine line between public opinion/free speach and slander.</p>
<p>My contact with both Yahoo and McAfee has been without fruit, as one can expect with such large companies. Contact with customer services about the problem has left me with nothing.</p>
<p>I have been forced to collect screenshots of the slander, collect documented thrid party proof that our website does not hold dangerous downloads and forced to collect leters and other proof from our customers regarding measurement of business damage.</p>
<p>Now I am trying a final time to contact the companies involved and with no anger, request that they update their systems. But to be honest, my patience is wearing thin.</p>
<p>So I say WELL DONE GOOGLE and dont try to be more policemen on this planet, unless of course your are preparaed to accept ALL the responsibilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo marks dangerous search results - TechEnclave</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/05/07/yahoo-marks-dangerous-search-results/#comment-335140</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoo marks dangerous search results - TechEnclave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 01:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=4029#comment-335140</guid>
		<description>[...]   read the article here  a new hope for ppl like me whose parents responsible for most spywares in the past and still [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]   read the article here  a new hope for ppl like me whose parents responsible for most spywares in the past and still [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: francois</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/05/07/yahoo-marks-dangerous-search-results/#comment-334391</link>
		<dc:creator>francois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 09:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=4029#comment-334391</guid>
		<description>I'm a google junkie. Every six months or so I use Yahoo and MS search engine just to see how long I can stand and have a good laugh. I don't now what Yahoo as done to its search engine lately but I find it now as good as Google's. I'm chocked, it's been two weeks I'm using it and is now my default search engine. O_o</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a google junkie. Every six months or so I use Yahoo and MS search engine just to see how long I can stand and have a good laugh. I don&#8217;t now what Yahoo as done to its search engine lately but I find it now as good as Google&#8217;s. I&#8217;m chocked, it&#8217;s been two weeks I&#8217;m using it and is now my default search engine. O_o</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
