Which Audio Player are You Using?

Me using the Nero Showtime latest version..i feel it gives a much better digital output

I use iTunes as I have an iPod so it contains my huge library, but I use WMP to play my favourite playlist when I’m gaming. This is because I have a G11 keyboard with media keys at the top that control WMP even when it’s running in the background, whereas it only works with iTunes when it is in the foreground.
iTunes is annoying in the way that it is very locked down, but I have the iTunes playlist exporter to export my playlists to formats that are friendly with WMP.

I mostly use VLC for playing music, but occasionally I use Windows Media Player.

i use windows media player 11… gives me good features in terms of library and playlists… i could do without the burner etc… but what the hell… looks super cool.
xm player is another good one… has a tiny footprint.

aimp2 is my choice since when I discovered it.. it has tabs for playlists, infos of every song showed directly in the playlist, a lot of useful features like copy to clipboard the song you’re listening to or capture radio streaming and much more.. must try it!
http://www.aimp.ru/

tried a few in the past was a winamp fan for years (until AOL took it over) now I use foobar2000

AIMP2 replaced Winamp 2 on my system a few months ago… I don’t know how I’d never come across it before!

Out of the box it has all the looks of Winamp 5 without the bloat, a huge range of options, nice crossfading and plays a much wider range of file formats than anything else I’ve come across. Also includes a set of utilities with it which are nicely separated from the player avoiding bloat for those who don’t want their player to also be their library, CD ripper/burner etc etc.

It also has Winamp compatibility for plugins although I’ve found this to be hit and miss in cases where the plugin expects to actually find a copy of Winamp somewhere. Works for my music blogging on Last.FM though Well worth a look!

BTW - if you really want to give Amarok a go and you don’t mind a good afternoon of downloading to get it sorted, have a look at the blog post here -

http://favdiggs.blogspot.com/2008/02/howto-run-amarok-under-windows-xp.html

I am still using WinAmp. On its own it is nothing special but it has a wonderful plug-in called Dynamic Library which searches the entire library as I type an entry, it makes it fabulously easy to locate any track.

I’m using both iTunes and MediaMonkey. I use iTunes coz i have and iPod, but b4 i have an iPod i started using iTunes too…. I like it bcoz MSN will display wat i’m playing in my iTunes….. I use MediaMonkey for other format such as FLAC, APE etc….

I sort of use a 3 program approach (overkill I know):

1. Media Monkey for regular playback… Fast, flexible, light on resources even with a huge library, and most importantly an amazing tagging application.

2. iTunes for transferring songs to ipod. MediaMonkey claims to have this capability, but I feel it is poorly implemented. iTunes is straight forward in this regard…

3. Winamp (any version with XM Radio)… I simply love the radio stations offered through the integrated xm radio on Winamp… great for trying to find new music.

Foobar200, why?:
1) it’s pretty lightweight
2) has a clean and simple interface
3) global hotkeys for users who don’t have a MM keyboard (though most players have global hotkeys nowadays)

i-tunes to connect with i-pod
but also foobar, foobar and foobar in everyday life because it is so much lighter than i-tunes

I was a Winamp user, but then dropped it when it became too bloated.

Foobar is cool because it’s really straight to the song.

I’ve just switched from Winamp to XMplay as recommended by Martin in his blogs. I like it a lot and will probably keep it as my default music player now.

I use Winamp for music and VLC Player for video because it simply plays everything!

XMPlay (default audio) and AIMP2 : BASS technology releases sound like no one!
Otherwise, whatever bloated it may be, Windows Media Player does play quite good IMO.
The worst I’ve met was RealAudio : anything but real!
Winamp only for Gracenote DB and CD ripping… We stopped being in love after version 2.x …

VLC, Winamp or Media Player Classics

I daily use iTunes when I listen to the music because of its splendid CoverFlow, even though I’m currently appreciating Songbird with this feature. On Linux the plum is Amarok!

Years ago I used Winamp, I forget why I migrated away from it. Anyhow, I started using WMP 9, now 11. It does what I want, namely plays music, without a bunch of features I don’t use and that just clutter up the GUI.

In my house, Foobar2000 since I only have WindowsXP here, but in my office I use Linux Mint and Amarok to listen music.

I use Cowon’s Jetaudio exclusively, for 2 big reasons:
1. It plays every type of music on the market.
2. It plays every type of video on the market.

Mostly VLC or GOM player but I also have KM Player which is excellent and extremely customizable

WinAmp5 with classic skins (modern support probably uninstalled ;P).

No CPU floods, everything work OK.

I can’t see the difference in performance between Winamp 2.x and 5.x. Of course, 3rd edition was hopeless but 5.x is IMHO very good.

Me, i’m using vlc player. There’s no big interface, it’s simple and does what it should: it plays music. sometimes i also listen to windows media player, because i can open it, click on play and it plays randomize through my library without much work for me.

Foobar. It’s light weight and highly customizable with global hotkeys you can set up for changing music easily at any time.

I love customization so Foobar is really the only choice for me.

for music I use Winamp 2.91
I think it’s Winamp 2.91 STD Final (1.62 mo)

memory, because Winamp 2.91 Lite Final (623ko) doesn’t read ogg and Winamp 2.91 Full Final (2.21 mo) is useless for me.

for a very long recording of several hours, I use media player classic, it’s possible to resize his window “to seek” easily.

iTunes for iPod
Foobar2000 for audio
VLC for video
Amrok for radio

Winamp 5. It’s got way less baggage than Itunes, it works out of the box (not a lot of tweaking needed), and I still get a robust media library.

I use Foobar2000 to listen to my fovorite albums, I have lot of playlists here, a playlist for each artist. It’s light weight, highly customizable and very good in sound quality. You can change everything in this player.

Foobar2000 is the Firefox of music

For occasional mp3s I use instead KMPlayer, my favorite multimedia player, so that if by mistake I click on a mp3, the music i was listening doesnt stop and the playlist on Foobar remains untouched.

I use Amarok when working at home (I run Linux). Recently started working in an office regularly at a WinXP machine and been using winamp, mainly because I’d used it in the past and foobar2000 didn’t seem to have a decent media library component (not one I could find intuitively).

Might take a look at AIMP and/or MediaMonkey…

If I could figure out how to get pulseaudio/andLinux to recognise my USB headphones as an audio sink, I’d probably be using Amarok on XP too!

I use MediaMonkey almost 24/7.
It can handle my 100+ gigs of music without additional cpu/ram load.
With a couple plugins, it updates my Now Playing status on MSN, can change my display pic to album art, and also uploads the album art and a now playing page to one of my personal websites. Last.FM gets updated usually too.

Itunes just seems to slow and clunky to me, but I don’t have an ipod either. I do however have to load up the Zune software to update my zune every once in a while..

Other than that, Winamp is my 2nd choice on windows. Linux I use Amarok, xmms, or mpd.

VLC 0.86f is the best!!!

Foobar2000 because it’s nice to my computers ram and cpu

Foobar2000 when on the computer.
Floola to transfer music to my iPod.

Winamp 2.8 for music, VLC for video

Winamp 2.8 because of performance (listening while playing games) and the equalizer options.

VLC because I’ve never had any codec problems or other stuff with it, and when I have video files with out of sync audio it’s easy to fix the problem on the fly with VLC

I’ve tried everything around but always come back to foobar2000 because:
-it can play anything
-it’s lightweight
-it’s very customizable
-it’s very tweakable
-sounds the best to me

Me too winamp 2.9

rhythmbox/vlc/AMAROK

On Windows I’m using the AIMP2.

On Linux I tend to stick with Rythym box, and on windows I normally use either Foobar or VLC. Lately though, because of my Creative Sound-blaster card, I’ve been using the Creative MEdiasource software that came with it more and more. It’s fairly fast (although, it can be a bit laggy at times when watching movies, but I don’t do much clicking then anyways). It also sorts through my songs fairly quickly, and adding new folders for it to scan is a breeze. It’s not my preferred application,but it does work well enough for me.

J River Media Jukebox

It was shareware but is now freeware. Think MediaMonkey. But, I think it blows MediaMonkey out of the water. Mainly because it has
1) A nicer interface
2) It can burn cds at full speed (MM is crippled)

I mostly use Media Player Classic and once in a while WPM 11. Used to use Winamp, but it got too bloated. Have tried several others that were good, but I just don’t listen to enough music on my comp to care that much.

foobar . . . I’m not into the nice looks of other players. I just want my music listed easily so I can play it. I find it much easier to organize and make lists in foobar, although there are some simple features I don’t understand why they are not integrated. Whatever, nothing is perfect. I guess I’ll just stick with v0.9.4.5 since I use Windows 2000. The newer versions require XP.

was using winamp….it bloaateedd so much i changed to XMplay

foobar2000 all the way!

I started with WMP, but changed then to WinAMP.
2 Weeks ago, my system crashed and I started to use BSplayer (wich I found on filehippo.com) because WinAMP uses ~20 MB RAM, BSplayer tops at 6 MB. It doesn’t care about the Playlist size, how long your last restart was, is skinable and plays the most audio and video formats.

But for Videoplay (AVI, …) I use VLC, for DVD’s PowerDVD (and sometimes VLC)

Long story short: #1 Rule to choose Mediaplayer: Less RAM usage –> Better

Used Winamp for years since version 2.0. loved it.
Until they jumped to version 5.So never could have used a winamp 4skin…
Swapped it for the then pretty unknown VLC and enjoyed it very much, the easiness at which it didn’t complain and simply opened every file.
Until I upgraded and had Vista installed, since then I use and love Kmplayer. It does everything and does it good.

iTunes. Nothing beats it on a Mac.

I’m using iTunes mainly as I have an iPod. I am looking to get rid of iTunes as it is a POS and go with maybe Windows Media Player or something else.

I forgot to say that I’m using ZOOM for video. It’s easy and flawless. I’ve tried VLC but had many problems in my system. I was using GOM but it had some little problems lately with .wmv.

Media Monkey here

It’s a very likeable player with good functions for sorting the music.

Wow! I never thought I’d get these many comments! Maybe I should post stuff like this more often. Thanks a lot everyone.

I use the latest version of WinAmp (currently v5.531). Ever since I discovered it, I didn’t change my Audio Player, even though I kno there are better Audio Players. I’m just too lazy to get a new one.

I use cowon jetAudio.
plays video & audio - supports almost all types of formats - minimizes to system try - can configure hot keys for almost all functionalities - have very compact interface while playing video- arrow keys for ffwd/rewind/vol up/down etc…
(these features are very important for me ‘coz my laptop dont have multimedia keys.)

Winamp 5

Amarok pwns all

I use Winamp 2.95 with a very clean skin, after all its for listening to music, its always minimized in the system tray as a set of buttons to play and advance songs, so who wants a super duper coolgy bungy shinyskin?
Then i use media player classic with klite codec pack for video. I like VLC and bsplayer too but i find media player classic its better, more configurable, i love it cause it starts centered on the screen, what i dont like its the poor playlist it has
sorry im not an english native speaker!

Winamp 5 with classic skin. Pretty lightweight, fast, and media library that rocks all other media players.

Windows:
foobar2000 (for albums and like, playing from library) + xmplayer (for single files, through file association)

linux:
amaroK

After trying Winamp 2.8 through the current version, iTunes, Foobar2000, Media Monkey, Windows Media Player, VLC, and Media Player Classic, I have settled on XMPlay for my audio needs.

With this many comments, maybe you should just make a poll

Foobar2000. Small, clean and fast - but can play almost any format.

But polls have very few options, this is most interesting and then please make an article analyzing all.

Only the best here:
Music, Video, Photos, iPod, iPhone, Documents, Podcasts, etc. with….
J River Media Center latest version (regular updates) !
@tash: because the poll answers are infinite.

winamp is my first choice.

1) 1-by-1 - simple mode (but not necessarily)
2) kmplayer - control mode
3) winamp - full monty

at home: mediamonkey. so good I even paid for it. - Lighter than most (especially iTunes)
- un-bloated
- excellent library management even for very large sizes
- neat interface
- flexible ripping solution
- works just well with my zen stone plus

at work: amarok (on Kubuntu)
- does most of what I need there correctly.
- I’ve met some really strange bugs though, but they happen very rarely.

My choice is MediaMonkey and my reasons are:

1. Low system resources
2. User friendly
3. Good interface
4. Great library options
5. Impressive tagging and audio files management options.

Hey man, too late, but my choice is XMPlay: ultralight, standalone, very simple use, fast open, modular plugins, extra audio HQ. Yeah, i love it!

Winamp, but definitely an older version. I’m not on the laptop at the moment, but it’s definitely beyond 2.x and below 5.x so maybe around 3? It’s before they added all the bells and whistles to make it a ‘media’ manager. Am going to read your review of Amarok later though because I do wonder about alternatives ^^

xmplay for just pure audio, no frills.

My default audio player is AIMP2. Light, simple, and beautiful; I love it cuz can hide it in the system tray, and still skip tracks and control volume. Testing Songbird and Floola, cuz iTunes ate a lot of space, just to transfer files to my iPod.

My video player is the simple, very light and versatil GOM Player. It’s just perfect.

Regards.

In windows, up until recently winamp was the golden standard.
however, as of late, the player is buggy as hell.

foobar, because of a plugin “quicksearch toolbar” that can even search in the folder name and filename (I can’t tag automatically since it’s mostly jpop, so I won’t bother to tag).

Foobar,cuz it has many cool but useful component. http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?title=Foobar2000:Components_0.9

I use VLC and Km Player—both are good and sooo much better thanReal or WMP player