<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blu-Ray hardware sales figures drop in 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/05/03/blue-ray-hardware-sales-figures-drop-in-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/05/03/blue-ray-hardware-sales-figures-drop-in-2008/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:02:41 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roman ShaRP</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/05/03/blue-ray-hardware-sales-figures-drop-in-2008/#comment-325655</link>
		<dc:creator>Roman ShaRP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 08:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=3984#comment-325655</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;That Blu-Ray would not win either because most consumers don’t need it ? That another company would come up with a better format, without DRM, for a lesser price ? I would love to see that. How about you ?&lt;/i&gt;

Oh, sure! 

My family is now happy with DVD player, which can play DivX and Xvid files from any type of DVD disk ;)
It would be nice to have more capacity on disk, than DVD can offer, but I don&#039;t see now critical need for that, and I don&#039;t need any DRM and big expenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>That Blu-Ray would not win either because most consumers don’t need it ? That another company would come up with a better format, without DRM, for a lesser price ? I would love to see that. How about you ?</i></p>
<p>Oh, sure! </p>
<p>My family is now happy with DVD player, which can play DivX and Xvid files from any type of DVD disk ;)<br />
It would be nice to have more capacity on disk, than DVD can offer, but I don&#8217;t see now critical need for that, and I don&#8217;t need any DRM and big expenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/05/03/blue-ray-hardware-sales-figures-drop-in-2008/#comment-325288</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 03:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=3984#comment-325288</guid>
		<description>While it does in fact use a blue-violet laser, it&#039;s actually called &quot;Blu-ray&quot;. With that out of the way, I thought it was a solid article. Although I don&#039;t plan on getting an HDTV for some time to come (or a high-def disc player for that matter), I had hoped that with the format war over, Blu-ray could go ahead full steam and establish itself as a solid successor to DVD. The more I see the statistics lately, the more it seems like this will take a long time or may not happen at all. One now has to wonder what, if anything, might be able to surpass Blu-ray as a successful format. Some are placing bets on digital downloads, but I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s ready for mass consumption yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it does in fact use a blue-violet laser, it&#8217;s actually called &#8220;Blu-ray&#8221;. With that out of the way, I thought it was a solid article. Although I don&#8217;t plan on getting an HDTV for some time to come (or a high-def disc player for that matter), I had hoped that with the format war over, Blu-ray could go ahead full steam and establish itself as a solid successor to DVD. The more I see the statistics lately, the more it seems like this will take a long time or may not happen at all. One now has to wonder what, if anything, might be able to surpass Blu-ray as a successful format. Some are placing bets on digital downloads, but I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s ready for mass consumption yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
