<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free Commercial Application Roundup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/05/02/free-commercial-application-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/05/02/free-commercial-application-roundup/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:02:41 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Varla</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/05/02/free-commercial-application-roundup/#comment-330518</link>
		<dc:creator>Varla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 14:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=3989#comment-330518</guid>
		<description>Yeah, one of these defraggers which I recognize is really ancient, like a poster above mentioned. Defrag technology has moved on quite a bit since the sizes of both drives and files have exploded in the last couple of years. 

Obsolete 4 or 5 year old defraggers will not work with Vista, and more importantly they will still have to be run manually or scheduled even on XP. I have 1.4 TB of drives in my photoediting rig, and I&#039;d guess that the old manual defraggers would take their own sweet time, rendering the system unusable for long periods. That&#039;s why I use an intelligent background auto defragger (yes, paid for, but totally worth it) on that rig.

Now, if somebody started giving away (legally!) freely some of the newer automatic defragmenters, I&#039;d be the first to sign up, ads or no ads, lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, one of these defraggers which I recognize is really ancient, like a poster above mentioned. Defrag technology has moved on quite a bit since the sizes of both drives and files have exploded in the last couple of years. </p>
<p>Obsolete 4 or 5 year old defraggers will not work with Vista, and more importantly they will still have to be run manually or scheduled even on XP. I have 1.4 TB of drives in my photoediting rig, and I&#8217;d guess that the old manual defraggers would take their own sweet time, rendering the system unusable for long periods. That&#8217;s why I use an intelligent background auto defragger (yes, paid for, but totally worth it) on that rig.</p>
<p>Now, if somebody started giving away (legally!) freely some of the newer automatic defragmenters, I&#8217;d be the first to sign up, ads or no ads, lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobey</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/05/02/free-commercial-application-roundup/#comment-329958</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 09:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=3989#comment-329958</guid>
		<description>&lt;3 Ashampoo Defrag, been using it for long and have been very satisfied with it. I actually use numerous apps from Ashampoo since they have a good approach to their customers by often offering older versions of their apps for free etc. Their apps usually aren&#039;t high-end sort of software but are still worth using. Thanks for the nice list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;3 Ashampoo Defrag, been using it for long and have been very satisfied with it. I actually use numerous apps from Ashampoo since they have a good approach to their customers by often offering older versions of their apps for free etc. Their apps usually aren&#8217;t high-end sort of software but are still worth using. Thanks for the nice list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/05/02/free-commercial-application-roundup/#comment-324892</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=3989#comment-324892</guid>
		<description>I think the old O&amp;O Defrag v4 is still much better than Windows defrags. I don&#039;t know about the other stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the old O&amp;O Defrag v4 is still much better than Windows defrags. I don&#8217;t know about the other stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michalis</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/05/02/free-commercial-application-roundup/#comment-324882</link>
		<dc:creator>Michalis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=3989#comment-324882</guid>
		<description>good job. many thanks from Greece</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good job. many thanks from Greece</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/05/02/free-commercial-application-roundup/#comment-324582</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 17:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=3989#comment-324582</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not older... It&#039;s more like ancient versions. :) I think system mechanic 6 was around late win98 times. I can&#039;t even remember OO defrag v4... Current is v10.

It&#039;s mostly dumb advertising (these magical &quot;we are giving you this fo FREE&quot; words) and such giveaways are of very little use (they are usually inferior even to modern freeware ones).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not older&#8230; It&#8217;s more like ancient versions. :) I think system mechanic 6 was around late win98 times. I can&#8217;t even remember OO defrag v4&#8230; Current is v10.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s mostly dumb advertising (these magical &#8220;we are giving you this fo FREE&#8221; words) and such giveaways are of very little use (they are usually inferior even to modern freeware ones).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dante</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/05/02/free-commercial-application-roundup/#comment-324416</link>
		<dc:creator>Dante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 16:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=3989#comment-324416</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the list.  Very useful!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the list.  Very useful!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
