<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Index.dat Suite</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/03/19/indexdat-suite/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/03/19/indexdat-suite/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 06:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ronin Vladiamhe</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/03/19/indexdat-suite/#comment-342801</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronin Vladiamhe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 22:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/03/19/indexdat-suite/#comment-342801</guid>
		<description>Though INDEX.DAT gives the user the option of getting rid of these internet files, WINSPY appears to be a lot more thorough. Use IE PRIVACY KEEPER to delete these files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though INDEX.DAT gives the user the option of getting rid of these internet files, WINSPY appears to be a lot more thorough. Use IE PRIVACY KEEPER to delete these files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transcontinental</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/03/19/indexdat-suite/#comment-281132</link>
		<dc:creator>Transcontinental</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/03/19/indexdat-suite/#comment-281132</guid>
		<description>How true, Martin. As for myself, I've located 'Temporary Internet Files' and 'History' System folders on a RAM disk. Not only are the index.dat files completely removed at shutdown/reboot, but RAM disk also speeds up access to files it contains. As for the cookie folder, I need it for the few IE cookies it handles, but when I notice that its size gets too big (like 200kb for 3 cookies!) I get it removed - erased - with a utility like 'GiPo Move On Boot' ...
Ever since IE 3.x those index.dat has been hammering everyone of those aware of what this crappy data handling means !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How true, Martin. As for myself, I&#8217;ve located &#8216;Temporary Internet Files&#8217; and &#8216;History&#8217; System folders on a RAM disk. Not only are the index.dat files completely removed at shutdown/reboot, but RAM disk also speeds up access to files it contains. As for the cookie folder, I need it for the few IE cookies it handles, but when I notice that its size gets too big (like 200kb for 3 cookies!) I get it removed - erased - with a utility like &#8216;GiPo Move On Boot&#8217; &#8230;<br />
Ever since IE 3.x those index.dat has been hammering everyone of those aware of what this crappy data handling means !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dante</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/03/19/indexdat-suite/#comment-281005</link>
		<dc:creator>Dante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/03/19/indexdat-suite/#comment-281005</guid>
		<description>Just tried it.  It works.  Would have been more interesting if I wasn't such a paranoid and have wiped everything already.  And being a paranoid, I had scanned it and found no malware.  But Zonealarm does indicate that this software wants to go out onto the Internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just tried it.  It works.  Would have been more interesting if I wasn&#8217;t such a paranoid and have wiped everything already.  And being a paranoid, I had scanned it and found no malware.  But Zonealarm does indicate that this software wants to go out onto the Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/03/19/indexdat-suite/#comment-280954</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/03/19/indexdat-suite/#comment-280954</guid>
		<description>Scott since I'm normally using Opera and Firefox I do not have such big concerns about the index.dat files on my system. I was not able to find them for the latest version of Internet Explorer 8 after running CCleaner so I guess they do a good job. However I was able to find the index.dat file for Internet Explorer 5 on my system even after running CCleaner. Not sure what I can make of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott since I&#8217;m normally using Opera and Firefox I do not have such big concerns about the index.dat files on my system. I was not able to find them for the latest version of Internet Explorer 8 after running CCleaner so I guess they do a good job. However I was able to find the index.dat file for Internet Explorer 5 on my system even after running CCleaner. Not sure what I can make of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/03/19/indexdat-suite/#comment-280927</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/03/19/indexdat-suite/#comment-280927</guid>
		<description>In your experience, Martin, have you found that CCleaner does a thorough job of deleting the index.dat files?  

For me, I'm not as concerned with seeing what the files contain as much as I'm concerned about being able to delete them completely, regularly...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In your experience, Martin, have you found that CCleaner does a thorough job of deleting the index.dat files?  </p>
<p>For me, I&#8217;m not as concerned with seeing what the files contain as much as I&#8217;m concerned about being able to delete them completely, regularly&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
