<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building a PC February Progress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:08:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tash</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-266602</link>
		<dc:creator>tash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-266602</guid>
		<description>I agree with Vance.
@Martin You should definitely go with the Intel Core 2 Duo E8400.   It&#039;s cheaper, faster, cooler, and very overclockable.  

I actually picked one up for about $180 the other day at a store here called Microcenter, and have it over clocked to 4.1ghz with little effort and it runs at ~35c with moderate load.   There&#039;s lots of reviews of people getting it up to 4.6 or higher without much trouble too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Vance.<br />
@Martin You should definitely go with the Intel Core 2 Duo E8400.   It&#8217;s cheaper, faster, cooler, and very overclockable.  </p>
<p>I actually picked one up for about $180 the other day at a store here called Microcenter, and have it over clocked to 4.1ghz with little effort and it runs at ~35c with moderate load.   There&#8217;s lots of reviews of people getting it up to 4.6 or higher without much trouble too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hipotetinis kompiuteris : nežinau.lt</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-266456</link>
		<dc:creator>Hipotetinis kompiuteris : nežinau.lt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-266456</guid>
		<description>[...] surinktų sistemų kaip rekomendacijų būna Ars Technica tinklaraštyje, bet kitur jos pasirodo tik autoriui perkant konkretų kompiuterį. Pagalvojau, kad verta tokią „atskaitos“ sistemą susikurti ir [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] surinktų sistemų kaip rekomendacijų būna Ars Technica tinklaraštyje, bet kitur jos pasirodo tik autoriui perkant konkretų kompiuterį. Pagalvojau, kad verta tokią „atskaitos“ sistemą susikurti ir [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-265453</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-265453</guid>
		<description>I agree with Dante.  Martin, you should spend a little more on your power supply in order to ensure it&#039;s a top quality model that won&#039;t fail on you.  I recommend this: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817139001</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Dante.  Martin, you should spend a little more on your power supply in order to ensure it&#8217;s a top quality model that won&#8217;t fail on you.  I recommend this: <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817139001" rel="nofollow">http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817139001</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saad Ibrahim</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-263809</link>
		<dc:creator>Saad Ibrahim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 23:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-263809</guid>
		<description>yup but i wanted to ask if there was any specific reason behind not choosing 45nm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yup but i wanted to ask if there was any specific reason behind not choosing 45nm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vance</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-263759</link>
		<dc:creator>vance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 20:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-263759</guid>
		<description>@saad same question that is why I recommend him the wolfdale as you can read above, Its cheaper, faster and has bigger cache.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@saad same question that is why I recommend him the wolfdale as you can read above, Its cheaper, faster and has bigger cache.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jojo</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-263466</link>
		<dc:creator>jojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 06:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-263466</guid>
		<description>I made a post here but it didn&#039;t show up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made a post here but it didn&#8217;t show up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jopo</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-263450</link>
		<dc:creator>jopo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 05:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-263450</guid>
		<description>I think you precisely prepared your compnent list. I wold consider another type of video card based on FeForce 8800GTS 512 MB (that &quot;S&quot; is important) belike, which seems to bo worthy its higher price. BTW, I have found some information about new prepared video card based on GeForce 9600 GT with similar power and better price expected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you precisely prepared your compnent list. I wold consider another type of video card based on FeForce 8800GTS 512 MB (that &#8220;S&#8221; is important) belike, which seems to bo worthy its higher price. BTW, I have found some information about new prepared video card based on GeForce 9600 GT with similar power and better price expected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dante</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-263352</link>
		<dc:creator>Dante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-263352</guid>
		<description>As to the power supply, if you leave your computer on for long periods of time, like I do, you might want to consider one of those new 80% efficiency ones.  They run quiet and cooler than the plain janes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As to the power supply, if you leave your computer on for long periods of time, like I do, you might want to consider one of those new 80% efficiency ones.  They run quiet and cooler than the plain janes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dante</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-263350</link>
		<dc:creator>Dante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-263350</guid>
		<description>Newegg has an 8800GS for US$160 with free shipping.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150275</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newegg has an 8800GS for US$160 with free shipping.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150275" rel="nofollow">http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150275</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saad Ibrahim</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-263265</link>
		<dc:creator>Saad Ibrahim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-263265</guid>
		<description>why aren&#039;t you getting a 45 nm processor? it will cost you less and a give you a little bit of performance boost</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why aren&#8217;t you getting a 45 nm processor? it will cost you less and a give you a little bit of performance boost</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-263256</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-263256</guid>
		<description>Arvin yes I&#039;m sure about this. It depends on the SSD drive however, the early ones have almost no advantage while the new ones do have great advantages over normal SATA drives.

Tom Compact Flash drives are to slow for this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arvin yes I&#8217;m sure about this. It depends on the SSD drive however, the early ones have almost no advantage while the new ones do have great advantages over normal SATA drives.</p>
<p>Tom Compact Flash drives are to slow for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-263250</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-263250</guid>
		<description>Consider hardware that&#039;s compatible with OSX86 - maybe down the road you might be interested in installing Mac OSX onto a spare drive...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider hardware that&#8217;s compatible with OSX86 &#8211; maybe down the road you might be interested in installing Mac OSX onto a spare drive&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vance</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-263249</link>
		<dc:creator>vance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-263249</guid>
		<description>why not get &quot;Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 Wolfdale 3.0GHz LGA 775 65W Dual-Core Processor Model BX80570E8400 - Retail price at $240 in newegg&quot; this is a newer faster processor with 6mb of cache. Plus you save 30 dollars!

of course if you can still wait for the e8500 which said to come out by march or april.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why not get &#8220;Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 Wolfdale 3.0GHz LGA 775 65W Dual-Core Processor Model BX80570E8400 &#8211; Retail price at $240 in newegg&#8221; this is a newer faster processor with 6mb of cache. Plus you save 30 dollars!</p>
<p>of course if you can still wait for the e8500 which said to come out by march or april.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-263243</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-263243</guid>
		<description>Have you ever thought about Compact Flash (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820208389) for the OS instead of SSD? Might be to slow for your PC but i think they run pretty good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever thought about Compact Flash (<a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820208389" rel="nofollow">http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820208389</a>) for the OS instead of SSD? Might be to slow for your PC but i think they run pretty good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arvin Bautista</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-263235</link>
		<dc:creator>Arvin Bautista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/15/building-a-pc-february-progress/#comment-263235</guid>
		<description>Are you sure about the advantages of the SSD drive? The tests on the Macbook Air SSD seems to show only marginal boosts in performance. I can&#039;t see it being cost effective for another year or two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure about the advantages of the SSD drive? The tests on the Macbook Air SSD seems to show only marginal boosts in performance. I can&#8217;t see it being cost effective for another year or two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
