11 Users Commented In This Post

Subscribe To This Post Comment Rss Or TrackBack URL
Arne says, December 17th, 2007   

Hi, I am using a Philips Brilliance 23″. The monitor was more expensive to buy one year ago, but the quality is great. Playing games is also possible and for regular working I use 1920×120 resolution (looks pin sharp, if you ask me)

http://www.eventdv.net/Articles/ReadArticle.aspx?ArticleID=38821

Bob Jones says, December 17th, 2007   

The 1920×1200 will be great, thats full HD (more infact) of over 1080 pixels.

Of course I think most manufacturers add a lot of money just for that reason …

slapjimmy says, December 17th, 2007   

i’ve always been a fan of samsung. build quality, specs, warranty support.

24″ i’d have a look at the 245B :)
http://www.samsung.com/au/products/monitors/tft/tvmonitor/245b.asp?page=Specifications

AussieRodney says, December 17th, 2007   

At work, I have a Dell 24″ running native 1920×1200 & I love it.

Angel says, December 17th, 2007   

I use a 24″ Dell at home and I love it. My main reason for buying it was because it gave me a lot of features for a lower price than a few other monitors I was considering at the time.

Steve says, December 17th, 2007   

My one suggestion is to get a size where the resolution you wish to use will look sharp and clear.

For instance, a few years ago, a former company was switching from CRT to LCD (non-wide format). 19″ was desirable to most people ‘cuz it’s bigger. To my eyes, however, a 17″ was sharper, since the max res was 1280×1024. With that res in 19″, I could practically see the dots.

As before, there is such a thing as “too big” with wide formats. To me, there’s no sense in a 24″ if the best you can drive it at is 1400×900.

I’d love to have 1920×1200, but the machine I have at work won’t come close. It’s only because of the adapter in the Dell docking station that I can do 1600×1050 on my Dell E228WFP. The laptop itself only puts out 1400×900.

Bottom line, don’t let your monitor dwarf your video card.

noneck says, December 17th, 2007   

I have a hanns-g 22″ Wide, 1080p HD, 1680×1050, 5ms response and 1000:1 contrast ratio. Haven’t had 1 problem with it, no dead pixels and its BIG. Easy on the pockets too at just 259.99!!
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824254020&Tpk=hanns%2bg%2b22

Seth B says, December 17th, 2007   

I have a 24” HP 2408 with the gloss coating screen. Thus far, I’ve had no problems and I LOVE the way the screen looks. Has the nice ‘90 degree tilt’ feature which is kinda nice for documents, though I don’t use it much.

Honestly, though, I’d say go with the 22″ for cost purposes, or just wait a bit longer. The new display ports and LED tech is coming out soon, and that’ll change the price of a good monitor.

rruben says, December 17th, 2007   

I am also looking for a new screen and I think I will buy a Samsung SyncMaster 20″ or 22″ depending on how much I have to spent at the time I buy it. I just love the screens from samsung, not only because of the quality but also because the whole screen just looks awesome.

Tobey says, December 17th, 2007   

Martin,
I’m very satisfied with my (black-silver) Asus MB19TU which I’ve been using for about half a year now. Though, it’s a 19″ only but great enough for all my work as well as entertainment.

http://www.asus.com/products.aspx?l1=10&l2=86&l3=355&l4=0&model=1378&modelmenu=1

If you do insist on a larger screen, check out the other models (got no experience with em):

http://www.asus.com/products.aspx?l1=10

deny.de says, December 21st, 2007   

make sure you have a great graphic card :D

Leave Your Comments Below
Hello, please leave your thought below

Please Note: Each comment will be manually approved by an admin. There is no guarantee that a comment will be posted. Please do not submit the comment multiple times.