24 Users Commented In This Post

Subscribe To This Post Comment Rss Or TrackBack URL
gnome says, December 10th, 2007   

(crosses fingers)

Let’s hope that Vista finally manage to turn into a decent OS then…

Martin says, December 10th, 2007   

To be honest I think that most of this is more marketing blabla and that the benefits for the end user will probably be not that impressive.

albright says, December 22nd, 2007   

WTF is a “a remote non-Windows Vista system”?

Only Microsoft at Pensieri di un lunatico minore says, December 22nd, 2007   

[...] Microsoft would fix the problems with 4GB of RAM in a 32-bit machine by doing [...]

mark says, December 22nd, 2007   

Albright - wtf do you think it is? Clue is in the wording… dumbass

saphorr says, December 22nd, 2007   

Albright, maybe you’re reading it wrong: this phrase should be read as

“a remote non-(Windows Vista) system”

and NOT as

“a remote (non-Windows) Vista system”

Yonah says, December 22nd, 2007   

For those with Ghetto hardware, and there are many, Service Pack 1 will not be the holy grail. For the rest of us with decent computers, Vista has been the most problem free OS to date, so this will bring little to the table, and many of these issues have already been fixed before hand.

John M. says, December 22nd, 2007   

Funny Title. IT Professionals don’t use Vista.

anon says, December 22nd, 2007   

The funny thing about “IT professionals don’t use vista” is that I AM an IT professional, and I do use Vista (and XP and win2k and Ubuntu…).

Adam says, December 22nd, 2007   

I am also an IT Pro… who uses Vista. 12 months ago, Vista was not ready for main stream. 6 months ago, it was. It is a better OS than XP, it takes slightly longer to boot… but it is more stable and more responsive once it is up. Non-technical people have problems with it because they are not used to it, and they blame non-compatible hardware/software on Vista but at this point it’s the vendor’s problem… Not Microsoft’s.

John M. says, December 22nd, 2007   

Wrong answer - most real IT professionals are saying “I AM an IT professional and I uninstalled Vista”. An increasing number of real IT professionals are also examining migration away from Windows.

Notebook manufacturers increases to 4 GB Memory as standard » D' Technology Weblog: Technology, Blogging, Tips, Tricks, Computer, Hardware, Software, Tutorials, Internet, Web, Gadgets, Fashion, LifeStyle, Entertainment, News and more. says, December 22nd, 2007   

[...] 3.1 — 3.3 GB limit. With Vista SP1 it seems that Microsoft has decided to fix the problem by reporting the installed memory rather than the available [...]

ITsVISTA Web Links: December 22nd, 2007 | ITsVISTA says, December 23rd, 2007   

[...] Windows Vista SP1 Guides for IT Professionals One of the SP1 changes is that Vista will report how much memory is INSTALLED, not how much is AVAILABLE. Is this a cheap ploy to make Vista look better, make it look like it can really take advantage of the RAM in your machine? (tags: Memory SP1 PR ) [...]

jred says, December 23rd, 2007   

Most IT pros I know loathe Vista. Most are running it to be able to support it. It helps to know how to use an OS when you’re supporting it.

strauprau says, December 23rd, 2007   

I’m a Theoretical Computer Scientist and I use Vista!

Kidding, I run GNU/netbsd

strauprau says, December 23rd, 2007   

I’m a Theoretical Computer Scientist and I use Vista!

Kidding, I run GNU/netbsd, suckers.

movl says, December 23rd, 2007   

I, for one, never migrated to XP, let alone Vista. Hence there’s no need to uninstall it.

BTW, “45% faster when copying files from a remote non-Windows Vista system to a SP1 system”
Compared to what?

“50% faster when copying files from a remote SP1 system to a local SP1 system”
Again, compared to what?

This is like saying ducks fly 50% faster then ducks.

This point is listed twice: “Improves responsiveness when doing many kinds of file or media manipulations. For example, with Windows Vista today, copying files after deleting a different set of files can make the copy operation take longer than needed. In SP1, the file copy time is the same as if no files were initially deleted.”.

PS. I run Ubuntu, used to run Debian, SuSE and slackware.

4Gb de memoria es el nuevo standard | Amephist Braindamage says, December 23rd, 2007   

[...] practico de 3.1 - 3.3Gb. Con Vista SP1 parece que Microsoft ha decidido arreglar este problema reportando la memoria instalada en lugar de la memoria disponible, pero sin usarla [...]

W.ordPress » Los 4GB de RAM y los 32 bits de Windows says, December 23rd, 2007   

[...] último es lo que ha decidido Microsoft: si miramos la lista de cambios que ofrece gHacks para el Service Pack 1 de Windows Vista vemos que ahora en lugar de reportar la [...]

Dito says, December 24th, 2007   

Seems to me windows keeps getting worse. where is Google’s OS already?

¿Más RAM? No, gracias « Conocimiento Libre says, January 2nd, 2008   

[...] más RAM que nadie en sus máquinas. Ni tampoco el señuelo cómplice que propone Microsoft con su Service Pack 1 para Windows Vista, capaz de mostrar 4 GB como memoria instalada aunque en la práctica no pueda [...]

Why Do I Need 4GBs of Ram? « Random Viking says, January 20th, 2008   

[...] which comes with many of these computers,Can’t even use 4GBs of ram, but it will try to make you think it can. 32-bit Linux also has this problem, as it is actually a hardware problem, but Linux has a hack [...]

mac says, March 20th, 2008   

the truth is… the IT market still belongs to M$ (say about 90% or so..) AND ALL OF YOU (incl. all those who consider themselvers “IT Professional…”) CAN ONLY FOLLOW M$… YOU ARE ONLY MOSQUITOS TO M$… AND THINGS WON’T CHANGE IN THE NEAR FUTURE… WHETHER YOU LIKE OR NOT VISTA…

Leave Your Comments Below
Hello, please leave your thought below

Please Note: Comments may need to approved by admin. so there's no need to resubmit your comments.