<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Adsense Revenue and Traffic Comparision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/26/google-adsense-revenue-and-traffic-comparision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/26/google-adsense-revenue-and-traffic-comparision/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:47:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: currencyx</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/26/google-adsense-revenue-and-traffic-comparision/#comment-660412</link>
		<dc:creator>currencyx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/26/google-adsense-revenue-and-traffic-comparision/#comment-660412</guid>
		<description>Nice post. What I&#039;d be more interested in is the %income related to traffic, because on that graphic all I can see is that they are related. Would be interested to know what % of that traffic translates into google cash. 
Given your traffic is 100%, earning is between 5% - 10%. Something like that would be really insteresting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. What I&#8217;d be more interested in is the %income related to traffic, because on that graphic all I can see is that they are related. Would be interested to know what % of that traffic translates into google cash.<br />
Given your traffic is 100%, earning is between 5% &#8211; 10%. Something like that would be really insteresting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine Optimization Tips &#124; The Shopping Network</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/26/google-adsense-revenue-and-traffic-comparision/#comment-602716</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engine Optimization Tips &#124; The Shopping Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 09:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/26/google-adsense-revenue-and-traffic-comparision/#comment-602716</guid>
		<description>[...] between Digg Traffic and Google Traffic. In addition, the webmaster at GHacks did his own Google Adsense Revenue and Traffic Comparison &#8230; complete with a nice graph. What this all means, to (re)state the obvious, is that there is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] between Digg Traffic and Google Traffic. In addition, the webmaster at GHacks did his own Google Adsense Revenue and Traffic Comparison &#8230; complete with a nice graph. What this all means, to (re)state the obvious, is that there is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ç½‘ç«™æµ?é‡?ä¸ŽAdsenseä¹‹é—´çš„å…³è?” &#187; Ghacks CN</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/26/google-adsense-revenue-and-traffic-comparision/#comment-184376</link>
		<dc:creator>ç½‘ç«™æµ?é‡?ä¸ŽAdsenseä¹‹é—´çš„å…³è?” &#187; Ghacks CN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 09:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/26/google-adsense-revenue-and-traffic-comparision/#comment-184376</guid>
		<description>[...] åŽŸæ–‡é“¾æŽ¥ã€‚  I hope you enjoyed reading this post. You may now subscribe to my RSS Feed, scroll down to ç•™ä¸‹è¯„è®º or get back to the homepage.  &#160;&#160;I recommend Giganews, the ultimate P2P alternative: Read here why [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] åŽŸæ–‡é“¾æŽ¥ã€‚  I hope you enjoyed reading this post. You may now subscribe to my RSS Feed, scroll down to ç•™ä¸‹è¯„è®º or get back to the homepage.  &nbsp;&nbsp;I recommend Giganews, the ultimate P2P alternative: Read here why [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: netking</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/26/google-adsense-revenue-and-traffic-comparision/#comment-183837</link>
		<dc:creator>netking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/26/google-adsense-revenue-and-traffic-comparision/#comment-183837</guid>
		<description>Hi Martin,

It&#039;s almost the same on my side.

I had a huge increase when optimizing ad position (cheated on you I admit ;) 

Adsense is generally matching the traffic, but, like you, a few unexplained glitches appears from time to time...

What would be more interesting would be to analyse the &quot;freshness ratio&quot; of your traffic. 

On my side, I didn&#039;t had the time to post frequently for the whole summer, and revenues were still steady, due to efficient referencing in search engines.

What I mean is : what is the part of you&#039;re earnings relating on &quot;old&quot; posts vs/ fresh ones...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Martin,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s almost the same on my side.</p>
<p>I had a huge increase when optimizing ad position (cheated on you I admit ;) </p>
<p>Adsense is generally matching the traffic, but, like you, a few unexplained glitches appears from time to time&#8230;</p>
<p>What would be more interesting would be to analyse the &#8220;freshness ratio&#8221; of your traffic. </p>
<p>On my side, I didn&#8217;t had the time to post frequently for the whole summer, and revenues were still steady, due to efficient referencing in search engines.</p>
<p>What I mean is : what is the part of you&#8217;re earnings relating on &#8220;old&#8221; posts vs/ fresh ones&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
