<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 Simple Ways to Speed up Windows Vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/19/10-simple-ways-to-speed-up-windows-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/19/10-simple-ways-to-speed-up-windows-vista/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:07:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kline</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/19/10-simple-ways-to-speed-up-windows-vista/#comment-209771</link>
		<dc:creator>Kline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/19/10-simple-ways-to-speed-up-windows-vista/#comment-209771</guid>
		<description>and yes, I turned on my computer about 10 minutes ago, and it is using 62MB of ram.  Maybe the difference is your resolution and number of screens.  62 is not much when one usually has over a GB, but rocking an IDE that eats up 640MB, firefox that eats down about 100mb and whatever test running set i am working on eating down another couple hundred... it gets down to every mb counting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and yes, I turned on my computer about 10 minutes ago, and it is using 62MB of ram.  Maybe the difference is your resolution and number of screens.  62 is not much when one usually has over a GB, but rocking an IDE that eats up 640MB, firefox that eats down about 100mb and whatever test running set i am working on eating down another couple hundred&#8230; it gets down to every mb counting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kline</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/19/10-simple-ways-to-speed-up-windows-vista/#comment-209769</link>
		<dc:creator>Kline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/19/10-simple-ways-to-speed-up-windows-vista/#comment-209769</guid>
		<description>Well, aero (DWM) visualisations is disabled when running games.   I am positive in my article, if you had read it, that I said that instead of turning it off you should  just tone down the animations, as they do slow down your productivity, even if only by a little bit, just by the time it takes to bloody animate screen openings, etc.  

Sorry again if I gave the wrong impression in my comments above.  And, when doing processor intensive actions, and aero is still sucking down 5-10% of your CPU, it does get annoying.

I guess it all depends on what your computer needs are.  Games needs are much different than number crunching needs, especially since most of them are GPU driven these days.  Also it sucking down 60+ MB of ram is a bitch since it never gets paged out, and working with large datasets, every mb counts.

I do appreciate your take on it, but I wouldn&#039;t call it a &#039;myth&#039; ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, aero (DWM) visualisations is disabled when running games.   I am positive in my article, if you had read it, that I said that instead of turning it off you should  just tone down the animations, as they do slow down your productivity, even if only by a little bit, just by the time it takes to bloody animate screen openings, etc.  </p>
<p>Sorry again if I gave the wrong impression in my comments above.  And, when doing processor intensive actions, and aero is still sucking down 5-10% of your CPU, it does get annoying.</p>
<p>I guess it all depends on what your computer needs are.  Games needs are much different than number crunching needs, especially since most of them are GPU driven these days.  Also it sucking down 60+ MB of ram is a bitch since it never gets paged out, and working with large datasets, every mb counts.</p>
<p>I do appreciate your take on it, but I wouldn&#8217;t call it a &#8216;myth&#8217; ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/19/10-simple-ways-to-speed-up-windows-vista/#comment-208332</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 02:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/19/10-simple-ways-to-speed-up-windows-vista/#comment-208332</guid>
		<description>Turn off Aero?  Ok, I thought this myth was killed a long time ago. 

Aero does use about 30mb more RAM, but it also speeds up your display. The composer of Aero itself is a performance boost, and working with WDDM it provides other mechanisms that improve performance, like assisting GDI/GDI+ and WPF on screen drawing.

Go look at some serious &#039;performance reviews&#039;, even games when running in a Window with Aero on usually run a few FPS faster than with Aero off.

Sure it is eye candy, but it is also the whole composer and acceleration portion of the Vista WDDM video subsystem.

Please, kill this myth and stop telling people to turn it off to speed up their computer.

If you really hate the animations, turn them off. If you hate the transparency, turn it off as well, but don&#039;t turn off Aero/DWM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turn off Aero?  Ok, I thought this myth was killed a long time ago. </p>
<p>Aero does use about 30mb more RAM, but it also speeds up your display. The composer of Aero itself is a performance boost, and working with WDDM it provides other mechanisms that improve performance, like assisting GDI/GDI+ and WPF on screen drawing.</p>
<p>Go look at some serious &#8216;performance reviews&#8217;, even games when running in a Window with Aero on usually run a few FPS faster than with Aero off.</p>
<p>Sure it is eye candy, but it is also the whole composer and acceleration portion of the Vista WDDM video subsystem.</p>
<p>Please, kill this myth and stop telling people to turn it off to speed up their computer.</p>
<p>If you really hate the animations, turn them off. If you hate the transparency, turn it off as well, but don&#8217;t turn off Aero/DWM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kline</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/19/10-simple-ways-to-speed-up-windows-vista/#comment-179808</link>
		<dc:creator>Kline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 21:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/19/10-simple-ways-to-speed-up-windows-vista/#comment-179808</guid>
		<description>Martin, alright, just trying to figure out if something was wrong with some of them by your thoughts.

Well, in  theory readyboost should benefit all users regardless of how they use their computer.  I&#039;ve read varying reports, but all have shown some improvment.  I&#039;ve yet to figure out if it is based on the drives they are using as many flash drives are absolute shite.  I did mention that point however.

UAC.. turning down the screen blanking has no effect on security, but for me, I see the screen quite often due to my own computer usage.  So, for me, it is frustrating to have my whole screen blank, wait a while, then come back... not performance per say,  but usability of the computer as well as overall productivity increase.  If a user never sees UAC messages, then you are right, it has questionable increases on performance.

Of course, the same would go for almost any tweak out there.. if its for a part of the system you do nto use, it is of no benefit.

I have not used UAC tweaker.. what all does it do that cannot be done via the management tool?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin, alright, just trying to figure out if something was wrong with some of them by your thoughts.</p>
<p>Well, in  theory readyboost should benefit all users regardless of how they use their computer.  I&#8217;ve read varying reports, but all have shown some improvment.  I&#8217;ve yet to figure out if it is based on the drives they are using as many flash drives are absolute shite.  I did mention that point however.</p>
<p>UAC.. turning down the screen blanking has no effect on security, but for me, I see the screen quite often due to my own computer usage.  So, for me, it is frustrating to have my whole screen blank, wait a while, then come back&#8230; not performance per say,  but usability of the computer as well as overall productivity increase.  If a user never sees UAC messages, then you are right, it has questionable increases on performance.</p>
<p>Of course, the same would go for almost any tweak out there.. if its for a part of the system you do nto use, it is of no benefit.</p>
<p>I have not used UAC tweaker.. what all does it do that cannot be done via the management tool?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10ç§?ç®€å?•è®©Windows Vistaæ??é€Ÿçš„æ–¹æ³• &#187; Ghacks CN</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/19/10-simple-ways-to-speed-up-windows-vista/#comment-179785</link>
		<dc:creator>10ç§?ç®€å?•è®©Windows Vistaæ??é€Ÿçš„æ–¹æ³• &#187; Ghacks CN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 21:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/19/10-simple-ways-to-speed-up-windows-vista/#comment-179785</guid>
		<description>[...] åŽŸæ–‡é“¾æŽ¥ã€‚  I hope you enjoyed reading this post. You may now subscribe to my RSS Feed, scroll down to ç•™ä¸‹è¯„è®º or get back to the homepage.  &#160;&#160;I recommend Giganews, the ultimate P2P alternative: Read here why [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] åŽŸæ–‡é“¾æŽ¥ã€‚  I hope you enjoyed reading this post. You may now subscribe to my RSS Feed, scroll down to ç•™ä¸‹è¯„è®º or get back to the homepage.  &nbsp;&nbsp;I recommend Giganews, the ultimate P2P alternative: Read here why [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/19/10-simple-ways-to-speed-up-windows-vista/#comment-179443</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 05:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/19/10-simple-ways-to-speed-up-windows-vista/#comment-179443</guid>
		<description>Kline, I simply pointed 4 tips out that I thought the most useful, this does not mean that I would not recommend the other 6 tips.

What I really have difficulties with is that some tips are probably ways to speed up Vista for you but many users would not say they are. Talking about UAC and Readyboost.

btw, do you know UAC Tweaker ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kline, I simply pointed 4 tips out that I thought the most useful, this does not mean that I would not recommend the other 6 tips.</p>
<p>What I really have difficulties with is that some tips are probably ways to speed up Vista for you but many users would not say they are. Talking about UAC and Readyboost.</p>
<p>btw, do you know UAC Tweaker ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kline</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/19/10-simple-ways-to-speed-up-windows-vista/#comment-179215</link>
		<dc:creator>Kline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/19/10-simple-ways-to-speed-up-windows-vista/#comment-179215</guid>
		<description>Which ones wouldn&#039;t you recommend?

I can see reservations on #1, but getting rid of the screen blanking is fairly harmless, and on some computers takes like 10 seconds to do..

Readyboost? You have issues with readyboost?  Bah..

And fixing the indexing service?  What possible issue could there be with that?

9 is just smart computer usage.  No program needs a &#039;quick launcher&#039; to run all the time when superfetch does it natively already.  Its double overkill. ;)

10 isn&#039;t a tweak, but its completely harmless, and if you have 2 screens, its better than paying for a $30 program to do it for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which ones wouldn&#8217;t you recommend?</p>
<p>I can see reservations on #1, but getting rid of the screen blanking is fairly harmless, and on some computers takes like 10 seconds to do..</p>
<p>Readyboost? You have issues with readyboost?  Bah..</p>
<p>And fixing the indexing service?  What possible issue could there be with that?</p>
<p>9 is just smart computer usage.  No program needs a &#8216;quick launcher&#8217; to run all the time when superfetch does it natively already.  Its double overkill. ;)</p>
<p>10 isn&#8217;t a tweak, but its completely harmless, and if you have 2 screens, its better than paying for a $30 program to do it for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
