<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Font Smoothing for LCD Displays</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/17/font-smoothing-for-lcd-displays/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/17/font-smoothing-for-lcd-displays/</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:50:55 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: cleartype-sucks</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/17/font-smoothing-for-lcd-displays/comment-page-1/#comment-1297329</link> <dc:creator>cleartype-sucks</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 15:49:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/17/font-smoothing-for-lcd-displays/#comment-1297329</guid> <description>1) why jpg? use png
2) I always used standard font smoothing; cleartype is way too blurry, and cleartweak or cleartype tuner don&#039;t help at all
3) why so small fonts; in order to easily compare your examples you should show examples with bigger fonts
4) I can&#039;t see a difference between screenshot 1 and 2; most likely, there is no standard font smoothing activated because the font is too tiny</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) why jpg? use png<br
/> 2) I always used standard font smoothing; cleartype is way too blurry, and cleartweak or cleartype tuner don&#8217;t help at all<br
/> 3) why so small fonts; in order to easily compare your examples you should show examples with bigger fonts<br
/> 4) I can&#8217;t see a difference between screenshot 1 and 2; most likely, there is no standard font smoothing activated because the font is too tiny</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sdfsdf</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/17/font-smoothing-for-lcd-displays/comment-page-1/#comment-1036771</link> <dc:creator>sdfsdf</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:51:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/17/font-smoothing-for-lcd-displays/#comment-1036771</guid> <description>Why do you use .jpg format for such kind of pictures? Moreover, with such high compression level? What do you think we can distiguish on it? Very unqualified job :-(</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you use .jpg format for such kind of pictures? Moreover, with such high compression level? What do you think we can distiguish on it? Very unqualified job :-(</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Yonoz</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/17/font-smoothing-for-lcd-displays/comment-page-1/#comment-169197</link> <dc:creator>Yonoz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:42:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/17/font-smoothing-for-lcd-displays/#comment-169197</guid> <description>ClearType Tuner (Open with IE):
http://www.microsoft.com/typography/cleartype/tuner/Step1.aspx</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ClearType Tuner (Open with IE):<br
/> http://www.microsoft.com/typography/cleartype/tuner/Step1.aspx</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Martin</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/17/font-smoothing-for-lcd-displays/comment-page-1/#comment-169094</link> <dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 08:18:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/17/font-smoothing-for-lcd-displays/#comment-169094</guid> <description>I use Clear Type and SMPlayer and it works perfectly..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Clear Type and SMPlayer and it works perfectly..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: nm</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/17/font-smoothing-for-lcd-displays/comment-page-1/#comment-169085</link> <dc:creator>nm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 07:27:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/17/font-smoothing-for-lcd-displays/#comment-169085</guid> <description>If you use cleartype with a video player like VLC, you&#039;ll end up with terrible image quality when playing videos.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you use cleartype with a video player like VLC, you&#8217;ll end up with terrible image quality when playing videos.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ace_NoOne</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/17/font-smoothing-for-lcd-displays/comment-page-1/#comment-168951</link> <dc:creator>Ace_NoOne</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:44:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/17/font-smoothing-for-lcd-displays/#comment-168951</guid> <description>ClearType makes my head hurt.
Unfortunately, setting it to 1000 (the lowest value possible) didn&#039;t help either, so I&#039;ll stick to standard smoothing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ClearType makes my head hurt.<br
/> Unfortunately, setting it to 1000 (the lowest value possible) didn&#8217;t help either, so I&#8217;ll stick to standard smoothing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thinker</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/17/font-smoothing-for-lcd-displays/comment-page-1/#comment-168946</link> <dc:creator>Thinker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:23:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/17/font-smoothing-for-lcd-displays/#comment-168946</guid> <description>I really don&#039;t understand it. I got good LCD (20&quot; samsung 205BW) and clear type is blured for me. I use standard smoothing and it is the sharpest of all smothing types.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t understand it. I got good LCD (20&#8243; samsung 205BW) and clear type is blured for me. I use standard smoothing and it is the sharpest of all smothing types.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
