<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Foobar2000, a music player with much more than you might think</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/07/foobar2000-a-music-player-with-much-more-than-you-might-think/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/07/foobar2000-a-music-player-with-much-more-than-you-might-think/</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 07:04:03 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Biomancer</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/07/foobar2000-a-music-player-with-much-more-than-you-might-think/comment-page-1/#comment-874158</link> <dc:creator>Biomancer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:07:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/07/foobar2000-a-music-player-with-much-more-than-you-might-think/#comment-874158</guid> <description>I used to be Winamp fan for years, and could not imagine, what else may I need from music player. Then I tried Foobar and it just changed the way I listen the music... Firstly I wanted it to feel and look in a way winamp does, but after some time become totally addicted to foobar itself.
The main reason, why I like Foobar so much, is it&#039;s customizability. It takes some good time to understand how things work there, and how to change them, but after spending that time you are rewarded with player, that behaves in a way _you_ want it to.
I use &quot;heavyweight&quot; Foobar, with lots additional components and advanced interface, because functionality is a main point for me.
What I dislike in Foobar is that it&#039;s Windows only...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to be Winamp fan for years, and could not imagine, what else may I need from music player. Then I tried Foobar and it just changed the way I listen the music&#8230; Firstly I wanted it to feel and look in a way winamp does, but after some time become totally addicted to foobar itself.<br
/> The main reason, why I like Foobar so much, is it&#8217;s customizability. It takes some good time to understand how things work there, and how to change them, but after spending that time you are rewarded with player, that behaves in a way _you_ want it to.<br
/> I use &#8220;heavyweight&#8221; Foobar, with lots additional components and advanced interface, because functionality is a main point for me.<br
/> What I dislike in Foobar is that it&#8217;s Windows only&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: lesinfox</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/07/foobar2000-a-music-player-with-much-more-than-you-might-think/comment-page-1/#comment-799603</link> <dc:creator>lesinfox</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 14:40:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/07/foobar2000-a-music-player-with-much-more-than-you-might-think/#comment-799603</guid> <description>I tried foobar but was not fully convinced me (i was too used to the way winamp worked). I use XMPlay, which is marvelous and does not install itself (extract and run). Some winamp plugins are also supported. That&#039;s worth the look !</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried foobar but was not fully convinced me (i was too used to the way winamp worked). I use XMPlay, which is marvelous and does not install itself (extract and run). Some winamp plugins are also supported. That&#8217;s worth the look !</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: nashaden</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/07/foobar2000-a-music-player-with-much-more-than-you-might-think/comment-page-1/#comment-796613</link> <dc:creator>nashaden</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 09:24:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/07/foobar2000-a-music-player-with-much-more-than-you-might-think/#comment-796613</guid> <description>I&#039;ve been using foobar2000 for about 5 years or so. Is it better or worse than winamp? I don&#039;t know - never used it. Foobar has all i need (and much more) so i&#039;ll stick to it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using foobar2000 for about 5 years or so. Is it better or worse than winamp? I don&#8217;t know &#8211; never used it. Foobar has all i need (and much more) so i&#8217;ll stick to it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Coup</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/07/foobar2000-a-music-player-with-much-more-than-you-might-think/comment-page-1/#comment-168278</link> <dc:creator>Coup</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:04:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/07/foobar2000-a-music-player-with-much-more-than-you-might-think/#comment-168278</guid> <description>Foobar2000, what can I say. Just start using it and love it. Low on your resources but high in performance. One player that can be customize to anyone needs.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Foobar2000, what can I say. Just start using it and love it. Low on your resources but high in performance. One player that can be customize to anyone needs.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Foobar2000ï¼Œä¸€ä¸ªè®©ä½ è‡ªç”±å?‘æŒ¥çš„éŸ³ä¹?æ’­æ”¾å™¨ &#187; Ghacks CN</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/07/foobar2000-a-music-player-with-much-more-than-you-might-think/comment-page-1/#comment-167543</link> <dc:creator>Foobar2000ï¼Œä¸€ä¸ªè®©ä½ è‡ªç”±å?‘æŒ¥çš„éŸ³ä¹?æ’­æ”¾å™¨ &#187; Ghacks CN</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:07:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/07/foobar2000-a-music-player-with-much-more-than-you-might-think/#comment-167543</guid> <description>[...] åŽŸæ–‡é“¾æŽ¥ã€‚  I hope you enjoyed reading this post. You may now subscribe to my RSS Feed, scroll down to ç•™ä¸‹è¯„è®º or get back to the homepage.  &#160;&#160;I recommend Giganews, the ultimate P2P alternative: Read here why [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] åŽŸæ–‡é“¾æŽ¥ã€‚  I hope you enjoyed reading this post. You may now subscribe to my RSS Feed, scroll down to ç•™ä¸‹è¯„è®º or get back to the homepage.  &nbsp;&nbsp;I recommend Giganews, the ultimate P2P alternative: Read here why [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jesse</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/07/foobar2000-a-music-player-with-much-more-than-you-might-think/comment-page-1/#comment-167438</link> <dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:36:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/07/foobar2000-a-music-player-with-much-more-than-you-might-think/#comment-167438</guid> <description>Foobar is great for old systems.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Foobar is great for old systems.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: cc</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/07/foobar2000-a-music-player-with-much-more-than-you-might-think/comment-page-1/#comment-167204</link> <dc:creator>cc</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 14:28:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/07/foobar2000-a-music-player-with-much-more-than-you-might-think/#comment-167204</guid> <description>I&#039;m a Winamp 2.X fan myself. I&#039;m perfectly happy with it and don&#039;t really feel the need to switch to another one. Having said that, I do have the Foobar setup in case I ever decide to give it a try.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Winamp 2.X fan myself. I&#8217;m perfectly happy with it and don&#8217;t really feel the need to switch to another one. Having said that, I do have the Foobar setup in case I ever decide to give it a try.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thinker</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/07/foobar2000-a-music-player-with-much-more-than-you-might-think/comment-page-1/#comment-167159</link> <dc:creator>Thinker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 10:35:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/09/07/foobar2000-a-music-player-with-much-more-than-you-might-think/#comment-167159</guid> <description>3rd and 4th paragraphs are the same in your news.
I use foobar 2000 because I have to  - after virus infected my system winamp doesn&#039;t run any more :(
And what I can say - winamp is 1000x better.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3rd and 4th paragraphs are the same in your news.</p><p>I use foobar 2000 because I have to  &#8211; after virus infected my system winamp doesn&#8217;t run any more :(<br
/> And what I can say &#8211; winamp is 1000x better.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
