<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft killing Autopatcher Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/29/microsoft-killing-autopatcher-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/29/microsoft-killing-autopatcher-project/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:09:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/29/microsoft-killing-autopatcher-project/#comment-165352</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/29/microsoft-killing-autopatcher-project/#comment-165352</guid>
		<description>As long as MS doesn&#039;t provide an easy way to download a whole set of patches for a system or an application (office), Autopatcher has his place and is helpul to Microsoft!

Their new website Microsoft Update Catalog ( http://catalog.update.microsoft.com/) is a good start but it miss some good filter functions. Admins want an easy way to download (locally) all updates until now for each OS.

Keep Autopatcher alive !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as MS doesn&#8217;t provide an easy way to download a whole set of patches for a system or an application (office), Autopatcher has his place and is helpul to Microsoft!</p>
<p>Their new website Microsoft Update Catalog ( <a href="http://catalog.update.microsoft.com/)" rel="nofollow">http://catalog.update.microsoft.com/)</a> is a good start but it miss some good filter functions. Admins want an easy way to download (locally) all updates until now for each OS.</p>
<p>Keep Autopatcher alive !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft关闭Autopatcher &#187; Ghacks CN</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/29/microsoft-killing-autopatcher-project/#comment-165309</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft关闭Autopatcher &#187; Ghacks CN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 08:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/29/microsoft-killing-autopatcher-project/#comment-165309</guid>
		<description>[...] 原文连接。  I hope you enjoyed reading this post. You may now subscribe to my RSS Feed, scroll down to 留下评论 or get back to the homepage.  &#160;&#160;I recommend Giganews, the ultimate P2P alternative: Read here why [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 原文连接。  I hope you enjoyed reading this post. You may now subscribe to my RSS Feed, scroll down to 留下评论 or get back to the homepage.  &nbsp;&nbsp;I recommend Giganews, the ultimate P2P alternative: Read here why [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NightFlyer</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/29/microsoft-killing-autopatcher-project/#comment-165121</link>
		<dc:creator>NightFlyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/29/microsoft-killing-autopatcher-project/#comment-165121</guid>
		<description>I must say I can see Microsoft&#039;s point on this in some respects, I&#039;m no fan of Microsoft but to be honest I think most other companies wouldn&#039;t have allowed it either.
  I&#039;ve used the autopatcher myself in the past on other machines and thought at the time that since it&#039;s not attached directly to Microsoft there could potentially be anything in the patcher. 
  Perhaps a better approach on Microsofts part would be to team up in some way with the autopatcher team and make it available as an option on the MS site as a download.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say I can see Microsoft&#8217;s point on this in some respects, I&#8217;m no fan of Microsoft but to be honest I think most other companies wouldn&#8217;t have allowed it either.<br />
  I&#8217;ve used the autopatcher myself in the past on other machines and thought at the time that since it&#8217;s not attached directly to Microsoft there could potentially be anything in the patcher.<br />
  Perhaps a better approach on Microsofts part would be to team up in some way with the autopatcher team and make it available as an option on the MS site as a download.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
