<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft killing Autopatcher Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/29/microsoft-killing-autopatcher-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/29/microsoft-killing-autopatcher-project/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/29/microsoft-killing-autopatcher-project/#comment-165352</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/29/microsoft-killing-autopatcher-project/#comment-165352</guid>
		<description>As long as MS doesn't provide an easy way to download a whole set of patches for a system or an application (office), Autopatcher has his place and is helpul to Microsoft!

Their new website Microsoft Update Catalog ( http://catalog.update.microsoft.com/) is a good start but it miss some good filter functions. Admins want an easy way to download (locally) all updates until now for each OS.

Keep Autopatcher alive !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as MS doesn&#8217;t provide an easy way to download a whole set of patches for a system or an application (office), Autopatcher has his place and is helpul to Microsoft!</p>
<p>Their new website Microsoft Update Catalog ( <a href="http://catalog.update.microsoft.com/" rel="nofollow">http://catalog.update.microsoft.com/</a>) is a good start but it miss some good filter functions. Admins want an easy way to download (locally) all updates until now for each OS.</p>
<p>Keep Autopatcher alive !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft关闭Autopatcher &#187; Ghacks CN</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/29/microsoft-killing-autopatcher-project/#comment-165309</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft关闭Autopatcher &#187; Ghacks CN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 08:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/29/microsoft-killing-autopatcher-project/#comment-165309</guid>
		<description>[...] 原文连接。  I hope you enjoyed reading this post. You may now subscribe to my RSS Feed, scroll down to 留下评论 or get back to the homepage.  &#160;&#160;I recommend Giganews, the ultimate P2P alternative: Read here why [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 原文连接。  I hope you enjoyed reading this post. You may now subscribe to my RSS Feed, scroll down to 留下评论 or get back to the homepage.  &nbsp;&nbsp;I recommend Giganews, the ultimate P2P alternative: Read here why [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NightFlyer</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/29/microsoft-killing-autopatcher-project/#comment-165121</link>
		<dc:creator>NightFlyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/29/microsoft-killing-autopatcher-project/#comment-165121</guid>
		<description>I must say I can see Microsoft's point on this in some respects, I'm no fan of Microsoft but to be honest I think most other companies wouldn't have allowed it either.
  I've used the autopatcher myself in the past on other machines and thought at the time that since it's not attached directly to Microsoft there could potentially be anything in the patcher. 
  Perhaps a better approach on Microsofts part would be to team up in some way with the autopatcher team and make it available as an option on the MS site as a download.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say I can see Microsoft&#8217;s point on this in some respects, I&#8217;m no fan of Microsoft but to be honest I think most other companies wouldn&#8217;t have allowed it either.<br />
  I&#8217;ve used the autopatcher myself in the past on other machines and thought at the time that since it&#8217;s not attached directly to Microsoft there could potentially be anything in the patcher.<br />
  Perhaps a better approach on Microsofts part would be to team up in some way with the autopatcher team and make it available as an option on the MS site as a download.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
