<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speed up Open Office</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:09:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Open Office vs MS Office - Page 5 - Raymond.CC Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-889334</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Office vs MS Office - Page 5 - Raymond.CC Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 22:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-889334</guid>
		<description>[...] OO, if you want a fast OO consider using one of latest versions (3.x) and follow tweaks suggested here or here, others available... 3 seconds on a cold start, 1-2 on a warm startup... btw my portable OO [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OO, if you want a fast OO consider using one of latest versions (3.x) and follow tweaks suggested here or here, others available&#8230; 3 seconds on a cold start, 1-2 on a warm startup&#8230; btw my portable OO [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-841953</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 05:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-841953</guid>
		<description>Good tweak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good tweak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yerowww</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-827443</link>
		<dc:creator>yerowww</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-827443</guid>
		<description>well its still kind of slow on the first run after I boot up... but opens in seconds</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well its still kind of slow on the first run after I boot up&#8230; but opens in seconds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Office 3.1</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-767731</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Office 3.1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 11:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-767731</guid>
		<description>[...] paths, better internationalization for Hebrew and Arabic plus performance improvements (read our Speed up Open Office article for even more tips on how to improve the speed and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] paths, better internationalization for Hebrew and Arabic plus performance improvements (read our Speed up Open Office article for even more tips on how to improve the speed and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aceqbaceq</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-525573</link>
		<dc:creator>aceqbaceq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-525573</guid>
		<description>i suggest a real method to increase performance of OpenOffice. the only way out is DOCK TO TRAY. by using kdocker or alltray.

but there is a difficulty. in manual mode (when you by using mouse indicates window) kdocker succesfully kick openoffice window to tray, but through command line it did not work by default. the solution is to define window ID of opened OpenOffice window and transfer it to kdocker.

here is script that you need put in $HOME/.kde/Autostart/office-to-tray.sh


#!/bin/bash

/opt/openoffice.org2.4/program/scalc -norestore &amp;

sleep 15

/usr/local/bin/kdocker -w `/usr/X11R6/bin/xwininfo -root -children -tree &#124; /bin/grep &quot;OpenOffice.org Calc&quot; &#124; awk &#039;{ print $1 }&#039;` &amp;

/opt/openoffice.org2.4/program/swriter -norestore $HOME/.1.doc

sleep 5

/usr/local/bin/kdocker -w `/usr/X11R6/bin/xwininfo -root -children -tree &#124; /bin/grep &quot;.1 - OpenOffice.org Writer&quot; &#124; awk &#039;{ print $1 }&#039;` &amp;

and you need put small simple .1.doc file to $HOME.

the result: celeron 1800,512Mb,FC4,KDE , xls file 450kb open for 5 seconds! 
and if use icewm even 4 seconds:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i suggest a real method to increase performance of OpenOffice. the only way out is DOCK TO TRAY. by using kdocker or alltray.</p>
<p>but there is a difficulty. in manual mode (when you by using mouse indicates window) kdocker succesfully kick openoffice window to tray, but through command line it did not work by default. the solution is to define window ID of opened OpenOffice window and transfer it to kdocker.</p>
<p>here is script that you need put in $HOME/.kde/Autostart/office-to-tray.sh</p>
<p>#!/bin/bash</p>
<p>/opt/openoffice.org2.4/program/scalc -norestore &amp;</p>
<p>sleep 15</p>
<p>/usr/local/bin/kdocker -w `/usr/X11R6/bin/xwininfo -root -children -tree | /bin/grep &#8220;OpenOffice.org Calc&#8221; | awk &#8216;{ print $1 }&#8217;` &amp;</p>
<p>/opt/openoffice.org2.4/program/swriter -norestore $HOME/.1.doc</p>
<p>sleep 5</p>
<p>/usr/local/bin/kdocker -w `/usr/X11R6/bin/xwininfo -root -children -tree | /bin/grep &#8220;.1 &#8211; OpenOffice.org Writer&#8221; | awk &#8216;{ print $1 }&#8217;` &amp;</p>
<p>and you need put small simple .1.doc file to $HOME.</p>
<p>the result: celeron 1800,512Mb,FC4,KDE , xls file 450kb open for 5 seconds!<br />
and if use icewm even 4 seconds:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-362901</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-362901</guid>
		<description>Quote from Ivo Pavlik:
Iâ€™m afraid nobody here realized that there always will be a big difference between OO run for the first time after boot and consequential runs. The main reason for this is the fact that the OO binary and data are wery likely to stay cached in you operating memory. In my case OO almost doesnâ€™t touch my hard disk during consequential startups.

Iâ€™ve of course tried your settings and measured beaviour for a while but there was NO difference in starting times of Writer (I didnâ€™t measured other parts of OO). After boot it took 12 seconds to start it and all consequential startups took 6 secs. Both with old and new settings. Maybe one important fact is that I donâ€™t have Java installed for OO.

End of Quote.

The only person with a brainsize worthy of being considered a human one. No, really.

Need proof? Load OO with default settings for first time and measure load time. Now do all the tweaking you want. Reboot and then load OO again. Feeling owned? You should.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote from Ivo Pavlik:<br />
Iâ€™m afraid nobody here realized that there always will be a big difference between OO run for the first time after boot and consequential runs. The main reason for this is the fact that the OO binary and data are wery likely to stay cached in you operating memory. In my case OO almost doesnâ€™t touch my hard disk during consequential startups.</p>
<p>Iâ€™ve of course tried your settings and measured beaviour for a while but there was NO difference in starting times of Writer (I didnâ€™t measured other parts of OO). After boot it took 12 seconds to start it and all consequential startups took 6 secs. Both with old and new settings. Maybe one important fact is that I donâ€™t have Java installed for OO.</p>
<p>End of Quote.</p>
<p>The only person with a brainsize worthy of being considered a human one. No, really.</p>
<p>Need proof? Load OO with default settings for first time and measure load time. Now do all the tweaking you want. Reboot and then load OO again. Feeling owned? You should.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendon</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-334746</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 19:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-334746</guid>
		<description>Yes! This was the answer... I suspect most was caused by the Java on my machine. I was waiting 30+ sec to get the program opened. Wow, does that seem like forever when the boss is hovering over you waiting for an answer that is contained in a spreadsheet...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes! This was the answer&#8230; I suspect most was caused by the Java on my machine. I was waiting 30+ sec to get the program opened. Wow, does that seem like forever when the boss is hovering over you waiting for an answer that is contained in a spreadsheet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivo Pavlik</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-239104</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivo Pavlik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-239104</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m afraid nobody here realized that there always will be a big difference between OO run for the first time after boot and consequential runs. The main reason for this is the fact that the OO binary and data are wery likely to stay cached in you operating memory. In my case OO almost doesn&#039;t touch my hard disk during consequential startups.

I&#039;ve of course tried your settings and measured beaviour for a while but there was NO difference in starting times of Writer (I didn&#039;t measured other parts of OO). After boot it took 12 seconds to start it and all consequential startups took 6 secs. Both with old and new settings. Maybe one important fact is that I don&#039;t have Java installed for OO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m afraid nobody here realized that there always will be a big difference between OO run for the first time after boot and consequential runs. The main reason for this is the fact that the OO binary and data are wery likely to stay cached in you operating memory. In my case OO almost doesn&#8217;t touch my hard disk during consequential startups.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve of course tried your settings and measured beaviour for a while but there was NO difference in starting times of Writer (I didn&#8217;t measured other parts of OO). After boot it took 12 seconds to start it and all consequential startups took 6 secs. Both with old and new settings. Maybe one important fact is that I don&#8217;t have Java installed for OO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-227580</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-227580</guid>
		<description>Since we started using the Open Office Quickstarter (something I would not do with Microsoft products) our speed problems have decreased markedly.  I manage some 1,000 installations, so this is significant for us...

Karl A. Krogmann</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since we started using the Open Office Quickstarter (something I would not do with Microsoft products) our speed problems have decreased markedly.  I manage some 1,000 installations, so this is significant for us&#8230;</p>
<p>Karl A. Krogmann</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soma</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-167340</link>
		<dc:creator>soma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 11:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-167340</guid>
		<description>it seems to work for NeoOffice on Mac OS X as well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it seems to work for NeoOffice on Mac OS X as well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fast Update II &#171; hardyweb:perjalanan hidupkuâ„¢</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-166501</link>
		<dc:creator>Fast Update II &#171; hardyweb:perjalanan hidupkuâ„¢</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 23:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-166501</guid>
		<description>[...] Open office [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Open office [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Office 2.3 Release Candidate 1</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-166293</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Office 2.3 Release Candidate 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 04:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-166293</guid>
		<description>[...] on the operating system that you download it for. Make sure you check out my tips on how to speed up Open Office loading times to make the most out of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the operating system that you download it for. Make sure you check out my tips on how to speed up Open Office loading times to make the most out of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ä¸ºOpen Officeæ??é€Ÿ &#187; Ghacks CN</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-166116</link>
		<dc:creator>ä¸ºOpen Officeæ??é€Ÿ &#187; Ghacks CN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 08:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-166116</guid>
		<description>[...] åŽŸæ–‡é“¾æŽ¥ã€‚  I hope you enjoyed reading this post. You may now subscribe to my RSS Feed, scroll down to ç•™ä¸‹è¯„è®º or get back to the homepage.  &#160;&#160;I recommend Giganews, the ultimate P2P alternative: Read here why [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] åŽŸæ–‡é“¾æŽ¥ã€‚  I hope you enjoyed reading this post. You may now subscribe to my RSS Feed, scroll down to ç•™ä¸‹è¯„è®º or get back to the homepage.  &nbsp;&nbsp;I recommend Giganews, the ultimate P2P alternative: Read here why [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lei</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-165657</link>
		<dc:creator>lei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 23:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-165657</guid>
		<description>WOW. Like Daniel &amp; Joe posted, i was looking for this speed up for years and was the main reason why i persisted with M$ Office. Thx so much for this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW. Like Daniel &amp; Joe posted, i was looking for this speed up for years and was the main reason why i persisted with M$ Office. Thx so much for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; ÐšÐ°Ðº ÑƒÑ?ÐºÐ¾Ñ€Ð¸Ñ‚ÑŒ Ð·Ð°Ð¿ÑƒÑ?Ðº OpenOffice &#160;by&#160;Lifehacker</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-164145</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; ÐšÐ°Ðº ÑƒÑ?ÐºÐ¾Ñ€Ð¸Ñ‚ÑŒ Ð·Ð°Ð¿ÑƒÑ?Ðº OpenOffice &#160;by&#160;Lifehacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-164145</guid>
		<description>[...] Speed up Open Office [gHacks] &#8212; LifeHacker [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Speed up Open Office [gHacks] &mdash; LifeHacker [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-164012</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 19:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-164012</guid>
		<description>Wow, I was looking for something like that for years literally. OO is starting faster than Word now... Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I was looking for something like that for years literally. OO is starting faster than Word now&#8230; Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: de-caf &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Speed up Open Office</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-164003</link>
		<dc:creator>de-caf &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Speed up Open Office</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 15:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-164003</guid>
		<description>[...] Start Open Office and click on Tools &gt; Options. This should open the configuration. Click on Memory in the left menu and change the following [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Start Open Office and click on Tools &gt; Options. This should open the configuration. Click on Memory in the left menu and change the following [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-163970</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 23:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-163970</guid>
		<description>thanks!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petri Ahava</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-163929</link>
		<dc:creator>Petri Ahava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 09:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-163929</guid>
		<description>Gee Wow Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee Wow Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-163927</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 09:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/18/speed-up-open-office/#comment-163927</guid>
		<description>Wow!
That really is a huge difference.This was a big reason I wasn&#039;t using OO.
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!<br />
That really is a huge difference.This was a big reason I wasn&#8217;t using OO.<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
