Comments on: Best Way to tag your mp3 music collection http://www.ghacks.net/2007/06/26/best-way-to-tag-your-mp3-music-collection/ A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas. Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:08:08 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: vs http://www.ghacks.net/2007/06/26/best-way-to-tag-your-mp3-music-collection/#comment-656224 vs Fri, 27 Feb 2009 03:56:56 +0000 http://www.ghacks.net/2007/06/26/best-way-to-tag-your-mp3-music-collection/#comment-656224 This program worked and did a good job. I have been planning to sort my itunes library for 2 years now (i have >5000 songs) and this thing did it in 3-4 hrs. The tags were dead on. Picard works great. This program worked and did a good job. I have been planning to sort my itunes library for 2 years now (i have >5000 songs) and this thing did it in 3-4 hrs. The tags were dead on.

Picard works great.

]]> By: Tristan http://www.ghacks.net/2007/06/26/best-way-to-tag-your-mp3-music-collection/#comment-156496 Tristan Sun, 01 Jul 2007 22:37:39 +0000 http://www.ghacks.net/2007/06/26/best-way-to-tag-your-mp3-music-collection/#comment-156496 I end up using Easytag in Linux, and then using allmusic.com and amazon.com for cover art and proper track names. It's time consuming, but more accurate than what I've seen with the autotaggers to date. Picard/Musicbrainz is good, but it still has a way to go for track accuracy in the Classical & Trance genres. I end up using Easytag in Linux, and then using allmusic.com and amazon.com for cover art and proper track names. It’s time consuming, but more accurate than what I’ve seen with the autotaggers to date. Picard/Musicbrainz is good, but it still has a way to go for track accuracy in the Classical & Trance genres.

]]> By: cc http://www.ghacks.net/2007/06/26/best-way-to-tag-your-mp3-music-collection/#comment-154184 cc Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:42:10 +0000 http://www.ghacks.net/2007/06/26/best-way-to-tag-your-mp3-music-collection/#comment-154184 How about using Mediamonkey :)? How about using Mediamonkey :)?

]]>