<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: DRM Free Music from iTunes hides account info</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2007/05/31/drm-free-music-from-itunes-hides-account-info/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/05/31/drm-free-music-from-itunes-hides-account-info/</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 07:04:03 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Nosh</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/05/31/drm-free-music-from-itunes-hides-account-info/comment-page-1/#comment-122732</link> <dc:creator>Nosh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 08:05:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/05/31/drm-free-music-from-itunes-hides-account-info/#comment-122732</guid> <description>It should be fairly easy for most crackers to alter or at the very least simply erase the personal info. Don&#039;t be surprised if there&#039;s a utility that does something of that sort appears very soon.
Besides, if a file with x&#039;s personal info is hosted on y&#039;s computer, x&#039;s lawyers could find a hundred loopholes (eg: they were stored on an old PC&#039;s hard drive that x disposed off) to prove it was not a voluntary. I think the rules of the game are pretty much the same. RIAA still has diddlysquat!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be fairly easy for most crackers to alter or at the very least simply erase the personal info. Don&#8217;t be surprised if there&#8217;s a utility that does something of that sort appears very soon.</p><p>Besides, if a file with x&#8217;s personal info is hosted on y&#8217;s computer, x&#8217;s lawyers could find a hundred loopholes (eg: they were stored on an old PC&#8217;s hard drive that x disposed off) to prove it was not a voluntary. I think the rules of the game are pretty much the same. RIAA still has diddlysquat!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
