You can bet that every tiny bit of new information about Google or one of their services will make headline news in a matter of minutes after it was discovered or announced. This time it was the discovery that the maximum attachment size for emails on gmail has been raised to 20 Megabytes.
While a 100% increase may seem nice it raises some questions about the usefulness of such an increase. Many mail servers will not accept emails of that size and bounce them back. It should also be noted that emails were never supposed to be used for large file transfers in the first place.
FTP and HTTP servers are the usual way of storing and offering files. I can only speak for myself but I would be very annoyed if I would find out that someone was sending me a 20 Megabyte attachment to my Gmail account. (or from his gmail account to one of my other accounts)
I don’t think that many users will notice the increase in first place and even less will really use it. It might be nice for sending someone high-res images for instance but that’s about it.
What is your stance in the matter ?
Enjoyed the article?: Then sign-up for our free newsletter or RSS feed to kick off your day with the latest technology news and tips, or share the article with your friends and contacts on Facebook or Twitter.Related Articles:
Gmail Raises Attachment Limit to 25 MegabyteIncrease Outlook 2010 Attachment Size
Check Multiple Gmail Accounts With Gmail Notifier
Gmail Background Send
Gmail Increases Email Security With Phishing Protection
About 1/3 of my friends got gmail, and most of others have will accept 20mb attachments too I think.
It’s very good, when I’m sending for example pack of photos packed into archive.
I have both Gmail and YahooMail. And I find that I use YahooMail a lot more. Why? Because I can store executable files up in Yahoo’s servers – for download at whatever site I happen to be at. Gmail forces you to first zip any file with .exe or .com extensions before you can email it to yourself for storage – a pain.
Gmail calls the blocking of emailing .exe and .com files as “security”. But Yahoo allows it with virus scan. And I use Yahoo’s free email virus scan to double check my own scans to make sure the program is reasonably clean for use. Why can’t Gmail have it’s own email virus scan engine? I though Google had already bought an antivirus company.
For the firefox addon gspace its good news :)
Dante:
Yeah, google could buy any antivirus company they need :P
Yeah I was just thinking of gmailspace as well. If I have to send something larger than an mp3, I use something like rapidshare or supload or yousendit. Cause I don’t need it archived permanantly.
Who exactly decided that email was not “supposed” to be used for large file transfers? Presumably someone back in the days when large file transfers were mostly impossible using email.
Now that it is possible, what is the problem?
If someone is sending you material you don’t want, regardless of size, then you have the right to be annoyed.
On the other hand, when at work, it is sometimes annoying to have to work with someone at another company to arrange a one-time access to their FTP site to provide them with some files. It is far easier to just email the files.
Find something reasonable to complain about other than the increased power of dp technology.
i like gmail more and it is very nice that we can send 20 MB it was a very big problem i faced before but now its done thanks to gmail