<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Taking a look at Microsofts Anti Spam Solution</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/29/taking-a-look-at-microsofts-anti-spam-solution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/29/taking-a-look-at-microsofts-anti-spam-solution/</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:48:51 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Peter Freeman</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/29/taking-a-look-at-microsofts-anti-spam-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-1167479</link> <dc:creator>Peter Freeman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 01:27:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/29/taking-a-look-at-microsofts-anti-spam-solution/#comment-1167479</guid> <description>Surely this page should be taken down or else comprehensively updated? There is another page dedicated to Windows Defender; this article is dated 2007, and Defender is no longer an &quot;anti-spam&quot; product.
The comparisons with other software products are way out of date.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely this page should be taken down or else comprehensively updated? There is another page dedicated to Windows Defender; this article is dated 2007, and Defender is no longer an &#8220;anti-spam&#8221; product.<br
/> The comparisons with other software products are way out of date.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: z0iid</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/29/taking-a-look-at-microsofts-anti-spam-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-104135</link> <dc:creator>z0iid</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:19:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/29/taking-a-look-at-microsofts-anti-spam-solution/#comment-104135</guid> <description>Autoruns from sysinternals is more comprehensive than HiJackThis - but run both of them if you want.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Autoruns from sysinternals is more comprehensive than HiJackThis &#8211; but run both of them if you want.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
