Rapidshare vs. Gema

Posted by Martin in Music Industry, The Web  Tags: , , , ,

28

Mar


Rapidshare, one of the largest file hosters in the world, is currently under heavy fire in Germany. The Gema, which administers the copyrights of more than 60,000 members as well as those of over 1 million rights owners from all corners of the world managed to get a court ruling in their favor. The court ruled (German website) that the hoster could be held responsible for copyright violations committed by users who upload copyrighted material to Rapidshare servers. The court furthermore ruled that Rapidshare had to implement filters that would prevent further copyright violations.

GEMA’s Chief Executive Officer Dr. Harald Heker commented: “The Court’s decision confirms that it cannot be the task of the rights owners to control at their own cost the continued operation of services, which generate commercial profit from unlawful use of their works. This decision will also send out a major signal to all services enlisting the help of the individual users to create a comprehensive illegal offer and then in the end to use this offer for generating revenue for themselves”.

Rapidshare announced the same day that they would appeal the ruling. The current ruling would have a drastic impact on every company that would operate from Germany (Europe) offering free disk space to their users. It is also important to note that it would be technically impossible to check every uploaded file if it would violate a copyright. It is for instance perfectly legal to upload a private copy of album to make it available to close friends. How would Rapidshare be able to verify if the uploaded file would violate copyright ?

It is in my opinion ridiculous to demand that Rapidshare, or any other company or individual who are providing webspace, is responsible for the copyright infringements of users who upload copyrighted files to the service. This would essentially mean that every webspace provider could be held responsible of a user would upload copyrighted files to rented webspace.

Click Here for a Free System Scan to scan your system for errors!

8 Users Commented In This Post

Subscribe To This Post Comment Rss Or TrackBack URL
Butty says, March 29th, 2007   

I’m starting to get sick of this kind of news… well, next will see the banks sue the car and guns manufacturers because someone robed the bank using a gun and run away in a car made by that manufacturers.

Tarantas says, March 29th, 2007   

I can sure understand the gema politics’. But I don’t like it. Gema just want to close gaps of copyright violation. I’m sure that many people in the internet don’t want to pay anything for media, but there won’t be a way to write music or shoot blockbuster for free.

I say there will always be a way to get what you want!

Me says, March 29th, 2007   

Of course Rapidshare makes his business on the copyrighted material ! And it’s what makes it so famous and huge ! What are users go find on Rapidshare other than movies, albums or softwares that are just released on DVD or CD, and even before they are ? What I wonder is how could Rapidshare grow so much and how it can still be active ?

Para 19a of the German UrhG says, April 6th, 2007   

is clear insofar. It is illegal to upload copyrighted material for download. Rapidshare must not knowingly help. But copyright is not so much a monopoly of distribution in Germany. It is perfectly legal to share music beyond the music business, see para 53 UrhG. What Sony vs. Universal was in the US, were audio tape recorders in Germany a long time before. Para 53 UrHG says that library building is legal. Time-shifting, bah….

We can say, that the para 19a UrhG, the letter a tells us that it is a new law, is owed to international conventions. Insofar the case would not be different in the US or whereever. Protection of copyright must be effectiv.

But the exact content of international conventions is dark. Regulations like para 53 UrhG are recognised too! And it could be asked whether it make a difference, in the light of para 53 UrhG, that analog copies have gone digital today and sharing has become easier in times of the net.

And: we should not forget the real impact of rapidshare. Some hundret downloads for hits and much less for other stuff, until it gets expired.

So when the day is over, there is not much to care about, even in the light of international conventions. The German lawgiver of para 19a UrhG was to fast. Sort of war against terror, axis of evil etc aka much ado about nothing.

Music Industry Gets An Injunction Against Rapidshare | TorrentFreak says, January 20th, 2008   

[...] the time, GEMA boss Dr. Harald Heker said: “The Court’s decision confirms that it cannot be the task of the rights owners to control at [...]

Zwartbaard.nl » Blog Archive » Music Industry Got An Injunction Against Rapidshare in 2007, Site Not Shut Down says, January 20th, 2008   

[...] the time, GEMA boss Dr. Harald Heker said: that the Court’s decision shows that it shouldn’t be down to the rights holders to police [...]

Music Industry Gets An Injunction Against Rapidshare « Kenny’s Entertainment Blog says, January 21st, 2008   

[...] the time, GEMA boss Dr. Harald Heker said that the Court’s decision shows that it’s not down to the rights holders to police commercial [...]

Zwartbaard » Blog Archive » Music Industry Got An Injunction Against Rapidshare in 2007, Site Not Shut Down says, July 16th, 2008   

[...] the time, GEMA boss Dr. Harald Heker said: that the Court’s decision shows that it shouldn’t be down to the rights holders to police [...]

Leave Your Comments Below
Hello, please leave your thought below

Please Note: Comments may need to approved by admin. so there's no need to resubmit your comments.