<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Advanced Spam Mails</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/12/advanced-spam-mails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/12/advanced-spam-mails/</link> <description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:32:29 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Richard Lindley</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/12/advanced-spam-mails/comment-page-1/#comment-101060</link> <dc:creator>Richard Lindley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:46:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/12/advanced-spam-mails/#comment-101060</guid> <description>The best way to beat spam is to stop playing the game.I use spam assasin on my front end which catches 98-99% of my companies spam.  The remaining 1-2% of mail gets treated to SpamLion (http://www.spamlion.com).  SpamLion uses smart sender validation.  A first time sender will recieve a challange mail to validate that they are a real person and not a spammer.  Once they respond their email will go through to the users inbox.  After that, they never have to validate again.  Obviously a user can decide to block them.  Users can also go through their personal quarantine and release items.Some people do not like sender validation because they think it floods the internet with validation mails.  If you set it up right and put spam assassin in front of it there is no problem.  I have it setup so that an email address will only recieve a challenge mail once every 30 days so if a spammer is using it to send out millions of emails the mail address will never get bombarded.  Also whenever a user sends out an email it gets automatically white-listed so a challenge mail is never sent.After about 30 days most users stop checking the SpamLion quarantine as by this time their normal contacts have all been white-listed.As a mail admin, I must say it is nice not to have to update my rules with the latest spelling of Viagra every week to keep spam out.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best way to beat spam is to stop playing the game.</p><p>I use spam assasin on my front end which catches 98-99% of my companies spam.  The remaining 1-2% of mail gets treated to SpamLion (<a href="http://www.spamlion.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.spamlion.com</a>).  SpamLion uses smart sender validation.  A first time sender will recieve a challange mail to validate that they are a real person and not a spammer.  Once they respond their email will go through to the users inbox.  After that, they never have to validate again.  Obviously a user can decide to block them.  Users can also go through their personal quarantine and release items.</p><p>Some people do not like sender validation because they think it floods the internet with validation mails.  If you set it up right and put spam assassin in front of it there is no problem.  I have it setup so that an email address will only recieve a challenge mail once every 30 days so if a spammer is using it to send out millions of emails the mail address will never get bombarded.  Also whenever a user sends out an email it gets automatically white-listed so a challenge mail is never sent.</p><p>After about 30 days most users stop checking the SpamLion quarantine as by this time their normal contacts have all been white-listed.</p><p>As a mail admin, I must say it is nice not to have to update my rules with the latest spelling of Viagra every week to keep spam out.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peter Louies</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/12/advanced-spam-mails/comment-page-1/#comment-101031</link> <dc:creator>Peter Louies</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 08:57:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/12/advanced-spam-mails/#comment-101031</guid> <description>At MX Lab (www.mxlab.be) we use of course several techniques like OCR to identify and block image based spam. Not all image based spam are detected and the spammers tends to change the images quite fast to make some techniques less effective.It is true that nothing beats the human way of doing it but this is very time consuming. It is possible if you only want to protect your own inbox but again, spam is getting on your system and you spend time in deleting it.We use a very simple technique now and have implemented it just before delivery of emails towards the mailboxes. I can&#039;t go too deep into details, spammers might read this also, but it keeps the emails with images for reviewing and also works with whitelisting.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At MX Lab (www.mxlab.be) we use of course several techniques like OCR to identify and block image based spam. Not all image based spam are detected and the spammers tends to change the images quite fast to make some techniques less effective.</p><p>It is true that nothing beats the human way of doing it but this is very time consuming. It is possible if you only want to protect your own inbox but again, spam is getting on your system and you spend time in deleting it.</p><p>We use a very simple technique now and have implemented it just before delivery of emails towards the mailboxes. I can&#8217;t go too deep into details, spammers might read this also, but it keeps the emails with images for reviewing and also works with whitelisting.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: lyndonmaxewell</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/12/advanced-spam-mails/comment-page-1/#comment-100832</link> <dc:creator>lyndonmaxewell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 07:19:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/12/advanced-spam-mails/#comment-100832</guid> <description>I guess the only way now is to bring the &#039;manual&#039; way back into the picture. That is, physically deleting and getting rid of those spam. Nothing beats a human at doing it!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the only way now is to bring the &#8216;manual&#8217; way back into the picture. That is, physically deleting and getting rid of those spam. Nothing beats a human at doing it!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/10 queries in 0.004 seconds using disk

Served from: www.ghacks.net @ 2010-03-18 22:02:39 -->