<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Find and remove duplicate images</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2007/01/30/find-and-remove-duplicate-images/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/01/30/find-and-remove-duplicate-images/</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:25:17 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: CrASH</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/01/30/find-and-remove-duplicate-images/comment-page-1/#comment-863866</link> <dc:creator>CrASH</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 15:31:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/01/30/find-and-remove-duplicate-images/#comment-863866</guid> <description>Kinda useless tool. Has one &quot;weight setting&quot; that defaults to some arbitrary &quot;35&quot;. To even find dupes that have just been Brightened or Gamma Corrected you need to up that single setting to its &#039;maximum&#039; 75. And it still doesn&#039;t find as many valid dupes as either  Visipic or DupDetector. Granted it is better than DupliFinder - while its&#039; still thinking about processing the 2nd or 3rd image in a folder &quot;Similiar Images&quot;, Visipic and DupDetector have all finished processing 1400+ pics and are displaying results.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kinda useless tool. Has one &#8220;weight setting&#8221; that defaults to some arbitrary &#8220;35&#8243;. To even find dupes that have just been Brightened or Gamma Corrected you need to up that single setting to its &#8216;maximum&#8217; 75. And it still doesn&#8217;t find as many valid dupes as either  Visipic or DupDetector. Granted it is better than DupliFinder &#8211; while its&#8217; still thinking about processing the 2nd or 3rd image in a folder &#8220;Similiar Images&#8221;, Visipic and DupDetector have all finished processing 1400+ pics and are displaying results.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Donald Rull</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/01/30/find-and-remove-duplicate-images/comment-page-1/#comment-338382</link> <dc:creator>Donald Rull</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 19:55:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/01/30/find-and-remove-duplicate-images/#comment-338382</guid> <description>What is DOpus?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is DOpus?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Howard Pearce</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/01/30/find-and-remove-duplicate-images/comment-page-1/#comment-118981</link> <dc:creator>Howard Pearce</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 13:59:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/01/30/find-and-remove-duplicate-images/#comment-118981</guid> <description>Too slow and too resource hungry.
My DOpus can find duplicates in 1/100 th of the time.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too slow and too resource hungry.</p><p>My DOpus can find duplicates in 1/100 th of the time.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dan</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/01/30/find-and-remove-duplicate-images/comment-page-1/#comment-108302</link> <dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:18:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/01/30/find-and-remove-duplicate-images/#comment-108302</guid> <description>I just installed this program and I thinkis really great, I have a lot of pictures and many of them duplicated, but in just a few minutes this program found all this images. Thanks for this tip.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just installed this program and I thinkis really great, I have a lot of pictures and many of them duplicated, but in just a few minutes this program found all this images. Thanks for this tip.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 20 Interessante Freeware und Open Source Programme &#187; Ghacks.net DE</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/01/30/find-and-remove-duplicate-images/comment-page-1/#comment-103298</link> <dc:creator>20 Interessante Freeware und Open Source Programme &#187; Ghacks.net DE</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 13:03:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/01/30/find-and-remove-duplicate-images/#comment-103298</guid> <description>[...] Images (review, developer) - Wenn man eine große Bildersammlung hat befinden sich mit Sicherheit auch doppelte [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Images (review, developer) &#8211; Wenn man eine große Bildersammlung hat befinden sich mit Sicherheit auch doppelte [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Steve J</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/01/30/find-and-remove-duplicate-images/comment-page-1/#comment-85382</link> <dc:creator>Steve J</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:52:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/01/30/find-and-remove-duplicate-images/#comment-85382</guid> <description>You just made my day :-) for ages I used the shareware program DPeg and then they did a rebuild of it and wanted me to pay for another registration so I decided not to bother with it anymore, been looking for a good image dupe program ever since.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You just made my day :-) for ages I used the shareware program DPeg and then they did a rebuild of it and wanted me to pay for another registration so I decided not to bother with it anymore, been looking for a good image dupe program ever since.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
