7 Users Commented In This Post

Subscribe To This Post Comment Rss Or TrackBack URL
Luke says:

It does look easy, but there is one problem here - the encrypted files are executable which means that:

1. Outlook will automatically block them
2. More sensitive server side virus scans will likely block or strip them
3. Most users will be very suspicious of these files seeing how we spent years training them not to open executables even from a trusted source.

While the self executable solutions are convenient, they are not necessarily the best choice security-wise.

Me says:

Isn’t it more simple to crypt un zip folder with Windows ?

Iain Cheyne says:

You could always use PGP, but that’s only useful between technical people.

Email certificates, like those provided by CaCert, are good between suitable email clients, like Outlook.

Martin says:

The main advantage of locknote is that it is fast and easy to understand. I prefer True Crypt when it comes to full scale encryption.

mouser says:

f0dder on the DonationCoder.com forum made a similar tool with some advantages (including a smaller size), called fSekrit:
http://www.donationcoder.com/Software/Other/fSekrit/index.html

Martin says:

Thanks for the tip mouser, will take a look at it soon.

James says:

I find the locknote most useful on a thumbdrive. I keep username/password info for different sites, online billpay, email, etc. I don’t think this was meant as a way to distribute anything in encrypted packaging. It is very practical for my use. If I lose my thumbdrive, I don’t worry but I have all of my usernames/passwords with me when I need them.
http://www.1chance2live.com

Leave Your Comments Below
Hello, please leave your thought below

Please Note: Each comment will be manually approved by an admin. There is no guarantee that a comment will be posted. Please do not submit the comment multiple times.