Fox, the big media company, is apparently forcing a website owner to shutdown his website for linking to tv shows at sites like youtube and dailymotion claiming that linking to those shows would be illegal. This question never made it to court before it seems – here we have it again. A big company with money enough to pay a dozen lawyers is suing a website owner who probably can’t afford to even higher one lawyer.
Now. What would you do ? Would you fight for the chance to win this uphill battle risking everything you got in the course of it ? Or would you give in although you might have every right to link to those websites and shows ? It is indeed a difficult question and I’m really not sure how I would react if I would face such a situation.
Would you personally say that linking to a movie on youtube for instance is illegal if the movie itself has been illegally uploaded to the site ? Would not it make more sense to sue youtube instead – they are hosting the content. So, why didn’t they sue google instead ? Could it be that google has enough money to hire some lawyers who would defend their site ? Could it be that Fox is not interested in a ruling at all ?
The same tactics can be witnessed when RIAA lawyers sue people. Most can’t afford lawyers and do what the RIAA lawyers tell them. The people that fight the ruling normally win and the RIAA backs out.
The main question however is the following: If it is indeed illegal to link to illegal content why aren’t they suing the search engines ? What if a website changes content and has now something illegally on their site ? Do webmasters have to check all the sites that they link to every day to make sure there is nothing hosted on them that could get them in trouble ?
Where will this end ? Can they sue me if I talk to someone in person and tell him that he should search for Simpsons on youtube to find and watch the latest episodes ? What if someone does not link directly to the shows but to a search results page ? Still illegal ? What if he writes down the name that his visitors should search for and links only to the main address of the video hosting site ? Still illegal ?
Where does it end ?
Enjoyed the article?: Then sign-up for our free newsletter or RSS feed to kick off your day with the latest technology news and tips, or share the article with your friends and contacts on Facebook or Twitter.Related Articles:
View Online Videos Directly On Linking WebsitesWatch hundreds of full tv shows, cartoons and anime
View TV Shows Online with Alluc
Baywords blogger’s Tortuga ?
Use MetaTube to Search 100 Video Sharing Sites
This will always happen I think (David vs. Goliat). But in this case I would assume that this is no different than finding illegal content from e.g. Youtube via Google.. Would it? In that case this is just an act to shut down the small sites that don’t stand a chance against the highly paid lawyers..
wtf IMO i say F**k!!!! the RIAA hahahahahahaha.
this will always be like this, why? because companys suck and they believe that they automatically can do whatever they want to the little man….but few fight the man, why? because the man can do it. Companys hold money, money that alot of people dont have…so they win…*hus hackers were born* ironically people dont quit *yay the little man* so they juss create new websites because they can thus the government cant stop us all….in the internet,where alot of things are illegal, its a matter of survival…the companys and the govnment vs. *the little man*