Some Firefox extensions seem to cause problems when enabling them, like making firefox slower or even crash the browser. This is of course not intended behaviour but it still occurs rather frequently when new extensions are released. The problematic extensions web site lists known bugs and workaround for many firefox extensions.
The table that is displayed has five columns. The first names the extension, the second lists the versions that are effected, the third provides a description of the problem, the fourth contains the workaround and the final column has reference links. Listed are many well known firefox extensions such as FasterFox, Adblock, NoScript and Greasemonkey.
I would like to present one example featuring the Greasemonkey extension. The problem reported is that Greasemonkey does not work on sites blocked by NoScript, another firefox extension. The workaround suggests to set NoScript to allow JavaScript on sites you wish to use Greasemonkey scripts on. Take a look if you are experiencing troubles, this site might help you overcome them.
Related posts:
Creating FireFox extensions5 Essential Firefox Extensions
Firefox Security Extensions
Ten great firefox extensions for 1.5
Firefox Extension Pack Basic


[...] Algunas extensiones de Firefox pueden causar que este navegador vaya demasiado lento o se cierre de manera repentina. En esta página se provee información sobre este tema. (Vía Ghacks ) Technorati Tags: Navegadores [...]
Extensiones para Firefox que ralentizan el sistema
Algunas extensiones pueden lograr que Firefox corra con lentitud o incluso ocasionar un crash en el navegador. Esto no es común, pero ocurre frecuentemente con extensiones recién nacidas, quizás que no han sido suficientemente probadas.
Sin embarg…
Weekly Tech: AMD/ATI powerhouse, Volvo C30, pwning Vista and bad Firefox extensions
AMD and ATI to Create Processing Powerhouse:
I think this sounds pretty good for AMD and ATI. Having CPU and GPU on the same dye sounds like it could be cool…if they can get it to work without suffering performance losses. They are also hinting…