<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: best free anti spam software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2005/11/07/best-free-anti-spam-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2005/11/07/best-free-anti-spam-software/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:58:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nnyan</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2005/11/07/best-free-anti-spam-software/#comment-24510</link>
		<dc:creator>Nnyan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 17:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=111#comment-24510</guid>
		<description>As a previous user of Spamihilator I can say that its a pretty good program.  I installed in on dozens of friends computers.  But I had a bunch of issues with users that had a very high volume of e-mail.  I went from using this to POPFile and while popfile is not 100% trouble free its much more reliable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a previous user of Spamihilator I can say that its a pretty good program.  I installed in on dozens of friends computers.  But I had a bunch of issues with users that had a very high volume of e-mail.  I went from using this to POPFile and while popfile is not 100% trouble free its much more reliable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Clarkston</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2005/11/07/best-free-anti-spam-software/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Clarkston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 18:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=111#comment-495</guid>
		<description>Spamihilator would require me to use a Microsoft OS at home, which I wouldn&#039;t do for any reason.  It also only runs as a proxy in local userspace instead of on a server filtering multiple workstations.  It&#039;s a good little program but very limited in scope and ability.

SpamAssassin can run as a &#039;spam server&#039; filtering thousands of e-mail accounts or it can be installed as a windows proxy program like Spamihilator.

It really depends on what your trying to do and what level of comfort you have with letting the spam get to your local computer before you bother to filter it.  Personally I run several servers at home one of which is a Slack box running SpamAssassin to filter pop3 and imap accounts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spamihilator would require me to use a Microsoft OS at home, which I wouldn&#8217;t do for any reason.  It also only runs as a proxy in local userspace instead of on a server filtering multiple workstations.  It&#8217;s a good little program but very limited in scope and ability.</p>
<p>SpamAssassin can run as a &#8217;spam server&#8217; filtering thousands of e-mail accounts or it can be installed as a windows proxy program like Spamihilator.</p>
<p>It really depends on what your trying to do and what level of comfort you have with letting the spam get to your local computer before you bother to filter it.  Personally I run several servers at home one of which is a Slack box running SpamAssassin to filter pop3 and imap accounts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2005/11/07/best-free-anti-spam-software/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 10:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=111#comment-161</guid>
		<description>To be honest, I have not used another spam program for the last two years. Spamihilator filters spam as good as a program can, I don´t see a reason to try out different ones if I already have a program thats really good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, I have not used another spam program for the last two years. Spamihilator filters spam as good as a program can, I don´t see a reason to try out different ones if I already have a program thats really good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jm3</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2005/11/07/best-free-anti-spam-software/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>jm3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 00:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=111#comment-160</guid>
		<description>how does it compare to spamassassin?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how does it compare to spamassassin?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
