<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Google Search Result Suppression</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2005/10/25/google-censorship-yes-it-exists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2005/10/25/google-censorship-yes-it-exists/</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:50:55 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: gHacks &#187; Google and Censorship</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2005/10/25/google-censorship-yes-it-exists/comment-page-1/#comment-985</link> <dc:creator>gHacks &#187; Google and Censorship</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:38:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=54#comment-985</guid> <description>[...] I´ve written a short article about google suppressing search results in some countries which did not seem to bother the public opinion in those countries and elsewhere. Recent news about google china censoring search results on the other hand seem to create more public discussion. Should western companies bow to countries like china that have a different view of freedom of opinion. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I´ve written a short article about google suppressing search results in some countries which did not seem to bother the public opinion in those countries and elsewhere. Recent news about google china censoring search results on the other hand seem to create more public discussion. Should western companies bow to countries like china that have a different view of freedom of opinion. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
